Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  3 |     partakes in movement, it follows that it must have a place.~
 2   I,  3 |    that is moved, so that it follows that if movement is in every
 3   I,  5 |     Another consequence that follows is that the animal must
 4  II,  1 |   its correlative decay). It follows that every natural body
 5  II,  1 |     From this it indubitably follows that the soul is inseparable
 6  II,  2 |      perceive, and think:-it follows that the soul must be a
 7  II,  2 |      to it. From all this it follows that soul is an actuality
 8  II,  4 |     what is intelligible.~It follows that first of all we must
 9  II,  4 |      the soul and in this it follows the order of nature; all
10  II,  7 |      this double possibility follows necessarily from our theory,
11  II,  10|     varieties of flavour. It follows that what has the power
12  II,  11|   surfaces; from all this it follows that in water two bodies
13  II,  12|     is made quite evident as follows. Light or darkness, sounds
14 III,  2 |    seen” if we look at it as follows. For as what asserts the
15 III,  3 |    last characteristic is as follows. Perception (1) of the special
16 III,  4 |    hindrance and a block: it follows that it too, like the sensitive
17 III,  4 |      potentially present. It follows that while they will not
18 III,  7 |   must now describe again as follows: That with which it does
19 III,  7 |     C be to D as is to B: it follows alternando that C: A:: D:
20 III,  8 |    the soul but its form.~It follows that the soul is analogous
21 III,  9 |     and decay to an end), it follows that, had they been capable
22 III,  10|  beginning of the action. It follows that there is a justification
23 III,  10|    farther away in time), it follows that while that which originates
24 III,  11| pursued which is greater. It follows that what acts in this way
25 III,  12|      This is clear from what follows. An animal is a body with