Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  3 |   magnitude,~could mind possibly think? Will it think with any
 2   I,  3 |          possibly think? Will it think with any one indifferently
 3   I,  3 |        the former, the mind~must think the same thing over and
 4   I,  3 |        is manifestly possible to think a thing~once only). If contact
 5   I,  3 |          could what has no parts think~what has parts, or what
 6   I,  3 |         parts, or what has parts think what has none? We must~identify
 7   I,  3 |   repeated, mind must repeatedly think the same object.~Further,
 8   I,  5 |        is with the whole soul we think, perceive, move ourselves,
 9  II,  2 |       decay and growth. Hence we think of plants also as living,
10  II,  2 |       about mind or the power to think; it seems to be a widely
11  II,  2 | primarily we live, perceive, and think:-it follows that the soul
12 III,  3 |        them from time to time to think diverse thoughts", and Homer’
13 III,  3 |          while it is possible to think falsely as well as truly,
14 III,  3 |          truth. Further, when we think something to be fearful
15 III,  4 |          less able afterwards to think objects that are less intelligible:
16 III,  4 |         mind too is then able to think itself.~Since we can distinguish
17 III,  4 |         says, how can it come to think at all? For interaction
18 III,  6 |       divided: if in thought you think each half separately, then
19 III,  6 |     wholes of length. But if you think it as a whole consisting
20 III,  6 |    possible parts, then also you think it in a time which corresponds
21 III,  7 |       from spatial conditions to think anything that is separate,
22 III,  12|       will not enable the one to think better or the other to exist