Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  3 |        called mind not like the~sensitive or the desiderative soul,
 2   I,  4 |      bodily part is mind or the sensitive or the appetitive faculty
 3  II,  1 |        of sense is to the whole sensitive body as such.~We must not
 4  II,  5 |        It is clear that what is sensitive is only potentially, not
 5  II,  11|     flesh was, like the tongue, sensitive to flavour, we should have
 6 III,  2 | sensible object and that of the sensitive subject are both realized
 7 III,  2 |      sensible object and of the sensitive faculty are one actuality
 8 III,  4 |   follows that it too, like the sensitive part, can have no nature
 9 III,  4 |     even have an organ like the sensitive faculty: as it is, it has
10 III,  4 |        the impassibility of the sensitive and that of the intellective
11 III,  4 |       Now it is by means of the sensitive faculty that we discriminate
12 III,  4 |        wholly separate from the sensitive faculty or related to it
13 III,  7 |       case of sense clearly the sensitive faculty already was potentially
14 III,  7 |         pain is to act with the sensitive mean towards what is good
15 III,  9 |        all animals, and (2) the sensitive, which cannot easily be
16 III,  9 |      Similarly it cannot be the sensitive faculty either; for there
17 III,  10|        of parts, a nutritive, a sensitive, an intellective, a deliberative,
18 III,  10|   either (1) calculative or (2) sensitive. In the latter an animals,
19 III,  11|       desire, but indefinitely?~Sensitive imagination, as we have