Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  5 |      is held to be of higher quality when contained in the former? (
 2  II,  4 | living things. But change of quality and change of quantity are
 3  II,  5 |    be some sort of change of quality. Now some thinkers assert
 4  II,  5 |     the one (a) by change of quality, i.e. repeated transitions
 5  II,  5 |      the substitution of one quality for another, the first being
 6  II,  5 |   development of an existent quality from potentiality in the
 7  II,  5 |    other and is identical in quality with it.~
 8  II,  7 |   case of colour, there is a quality found both in air and water,
 9  II,  9 |      the smell have the same quality, i.e. both are sweet or
10  II,  11|     a degree of the sensible quality lying beyond the neutral
11  II,  11|      like air possesses some quality of tangible things in a
12  II,  12|   what alone matters is what quality it has, i.e. in what ratio
13  II,  12|    affected, i.e. altered in quality? Must we not, then, admit
14 III,  2 |     and indeed each sensible quality from every other, with what
15 III,  2 |      if what is sweet be the quality perceived, it moves the
16 III,  4 |    so, it would acquire some quality, e.g. warmth or cold, or
17 III,  13|   the case of every sensible quality excess destroys the organ,