Book, Paragraph

  1   I,  1 |           for the soul is in some sense the principle of animal
  2   I,  1 |      correlative objects, e.g. of sense or thought? It seems not
  3   I,  2 |         and low, but mind (in the sense of intelligence) appears
  4   I,  2 |      further, in the most primary sense, fire both is moved and
  5   I,  3 |          are moved in a different sense from that in which the ship
  6   I,  3 |            Recognizing the double sense of "being moved", what we
  7   I,  3 |         one and continuous in the sense in~which the process of
  8   I,  3 |          understood either in the~sense of a spatial magnitude or
  9   I,  3 |       spatial magnitude or in the sense of a point (if a point~can
 10   I,  4 |         our mind; the most proper sense is in relation to spatial
 11   I,  4 |        with it, and the secondary sense, derived from the former,
 12   I,  4 |          soul is a harmony in the sense of the mode of composition
 13   I,  4 |      possible, and even that in a sense it can move itself, i.e.
 14   I,  4 |          move itself, i.e. in the sense that the vehicle in which
 15   I,  4 |          moved by it; in no other sense can the soul be moved in
 16   I,  4 |        actual or residual, in the sense organs.~The case of mind
 17   I,  4 |        happens in the case of the sense organs; if the old man could
 18  II,  1 |        several senses, (a) in the sense of matter or that which
 19  II,  1 |           a this", and (b) in the sense of form or essence, which
 20  II,  1 |            and thirdly (c) in the sense of that which is compounded
 21  II,  1 |          it is a substance in the sense of a composite.~But since
 22  II,  1 |        must be a substance in the sense of the form of a natural
 23  II,  1 |         is actuality in the first sense, viz. that of knowledge
 24  II,  1 |       most proper and fundamental sense of both is the relation
 25  II,  1 |            It is substance in the sense which corresponds to the
 26  II,  1 |         for what the departmental sense is to the bodily part which
 27  II,  1 |         that the whole faculty of sense is to the whole sensitive
 28  II,  1 |          waking is actuality in a sense corresponding to the cutting
 29  II,  1 |          soul is actuality in the sense corresponding to the power
 30  II,  1 |      actuality of its body in the sense in which the sailor is the
 31  II,  2 |       this word has more than one sense, and provided any one alone
 32  II,  2 |          rest, or movement in the sense of nutrition, decay and
 33  II,  2 |       things.~The primary form of sense is touch, which belongs
 34  II,  2 |           from all other forms of sense. (By the power of self-nutrition
 35  II,  2 |          are observed to have the sense of touch.) What the explanation
 36  II,  2 |         if a part, a part in what sense? A part merely distinguishable
 37  II,  3 |          now all animals have one sense at least, viz. touch, and
 38  II,  3 |         touch, and whatever has a sense has the capacity for pleasure
 39  II,  3 |     Further, all animals have the sense for food (for touch is the
 40  II,  3 |        for food (for touch is the sense for food); the food of all
 41  II,  3 |          animals that possess the sense of touch have also appetition.
 42  II,  3 |          of soul only in the same sense as one can be given of figure.
 43  II,  3 |        from the former. Again, no sense is found apart from that
 44  II,  3 |        living things that possess sense some have the power of locomotion,
 45  II,  4 |           A concurrent cause in a sense it certainly is, but not
 46  II,  4 |     another in precisely the same sense; water may be said to feed
 47  II,  4 |         of it; taking food in the sense of undigested matter, it
 48  II,  4 |           clear that in a certain sense we may say that both parties
 49  II,  5 |           sensation in the widest sense. Sensation depends, as we
 50  II,  5 |    affected only by like; in what sense this is possible and in
 51  II,  5 |           is possible and in what sense impossible, we have explained
 52  II,  5 |           the external objects of sense, or why without the stimulation
 53  II,  5 |         indirect objects is so of sense? It is clear that what is
 54  II,  5 |        not actually. The power of sense is parallel to what is combustible,
 55  II,  5 |          sees" or "hears". Hence "sense" too must have two meanings,
 56  II,  5 |           must have two meanings, sense potential, and sense actual.
 57  II,  5 |    meanings, sense potential, and sense actual. Similarly "to be
 58  II,  5 |           Hence it is that in one sense, as has already been stated,
 59  II,  5 |        these phrases had only one sense. We can speak of something
 60  II,  5 |  actuality and in the most proper sense is knowing, e.g. this A.
 61  II,  5 |        the inactive possession of sense or grammar to their active
 62  II,  5 |   alteration in a quite different sense from the usual meaning.~
 63  II,  5 |        case of what is to possess sense, the first transition is
 64  II,  5 |    universals, and these are in a sense within the soul. That is
 65  II,  5 |         of two senses, (a) in the sense in which we might say of
 66  II,  5 |           a general or (b) in the sense in which we might say the
 67  II,  6 |         each. The term "object of sense" covers three kinds of objects,
 68  II,  6 |           perceptible by a single sense, the other (b) of what is
 69  II,  6 |    special object of this or that sense that which cannot be perceived
 70  II,  6 |         be perceived by any other sense than that one and in respect
 71  II,  6 |        error is possible; in this sense colour is the special object
 72  II,  6 |         different qualities. Each sense has one kind of object which
 73  II,  6 |           objects of this or that sense.~"Common sensibles" are
 74  II,  6 |           not peculiar to any one sense, but are common to all.
 75  II,  6 |           an incidental object of sense where e.g. the white object
 76  II,  6 |         incidentally an object of sense, it in no way as such affects
 77  II,  6 |         own nature perceptible by sense, the first kind-that of
 78  II,  6 |  senses-constitute the objects of sense in the strictest sense of
 79  II,  6 |         of sense in the strictest sense of the term and it is to
 80  II,  6 |         structure of each several sense is adapted.~
 81  II,  7 |         in darkness stimulate the sense; that is, things that appear
 82  II,  7 |          sets in movement not the sense organ but what is transparent,
 83  II,  7 |          land seem to possess the sense of smell, and "in air" because
 84  II,  8 |   respectively (a) what moves the sense much in a short time, (b)
 85  II,  8 |          time, (b) what moves the sense little in a long time. Not
 86  II,  9 |          animals; men have a poor sense of smell and our apprehension
 87  II,  9 |         difference being that our sense of taste is more discriminating
 88  II,  9 |           discriminating than our sense of smell, because the former
 89  II,  9 |            and so on.~In the same sense in which hearing has for
 90  II,  9 |         contact with the organ of sense, but our failure to apprehend
 91  II,  9 |           argued, have some novel sense not reckoned among the usual
 92  II,  9 |        scent that is perceived; a sense that apprehends what is
 93  II,  10|        liquid; what acts upon the sense of taste must be either
 94  II,  10|         what tends to destroy the sense of taste. In this it is
 95  II,  10|           is "inaudible", so in a sense is a loud or violent sound.
 96  II,  10|       tasteless-the latter in the sense of what has little flavour
 97  II,  11|          if touch is not a single sense but a group of senses, there
 98  II,  11|         whether touch is a single sense or a group of senses. It
 99  II,  11|         because the field of each sense is according to the accepted
100  II,  11|          and smell to be a single sense. But as it is, because that
101  II,  11|        should have identified the sense of taste and the sense of
102  II,  11|        the sense of taste and the sense of touch; what saves us
103  II,  11|      perception of all objects of sense take place in the same way,
104  II,  11|       body in which primarily the sense of touch resides. This is
105  II,  11|      point. This implies that the sense itself is a "mean" between
106  II,  11|       determine the field of that sense. It is to this that it owes
107  II,  11|        nor cold.~Further, as in a sense sight had for its object
108  II,  12|         applying to any and every sense may now be formulated.~(
109  II,  12|          be formulated.~(A) By a "sense" is meant what has the power
110  II,  12|  difference: in a similar way the sense is affected by what is coloured
111  II,  12|     combined.~(B) By "an organ of sense" is meant that in which
112  II,  12|       such a power is seated.~The sense and its organ are the same
113  II,  12|          power to perceive or the sense itself is a magnitude; what
114  II,  12|         to explain why objects of sense which possess one of two
115  II,  12|    opposite destroy the organs of sense; if the movement set up
116  II,  12|         become perceptible to the sense of smell, smelling is an
117 III,  1 |          1~THAT there is no sixth sense in addition to the five
118 III,  1 |       touch); and if absence of a sense necessarily involves absence
119 III,  1 |       perceptible by touch, which sense we actually possess, and (
120 III,  1 |         elements of our world, no sense can be wanting to such animals.~
121 III,  1 |      through this or that special sense, e.g. movement, rest, figure,
122 III,  1 |       special sensibles; for each sense perceives one class of sensible
123 III,  1 |         there should be a special sense for any one of the common
124 III,  1 |           is so because we have a sense for each of the two qualities,
125 III,  1 |           is therefore no special sense required for their perception:
126 III,  1 |        not because the percipient sense is this or that special
127 III,  1 |           is this or that special sense, but because all form a
128 III,  1 |   perception takes place whenever sense is directed at one and the
129 III,  1 |     senses; hence the illusion of sense, e.g. the belief that if
130 III,  1 |      special sensibles? Had we no sense but sight, and that sense
131 III,  1 |         sense but sight, and that sense no object but white, they
132 III,  1 |          objects of more than one sense reveals their distinction
133 III,  2 |             2~Since it is through sense that we are aware that we
134 III,  2 |       aware of seeing, or by some sense other than sight. But the
135 III,  2 |         other than sight. But the sense that gives us this new sensation
136 III,  2 |       sensible object, or (2) the sense must be percipient of itself.
137 III,  2 |      itself. Further, even if the sense which perceives sight were
138 III,  2 |           must somewhere assume a sense which is aware of itself.
139 III,  2 |       from another. Further, in a sense even that which sees is
140 III,  2 |        and that of the percipient sense is one and the same activity,
141 III,  2 |       partly true, partly false: "sense" and "the sensible object"
142 III,  2 |          hearing of it are in one sense one and the same, and if
143 III,  2 |       savours excess destroys the sense of taste, and in the case
144 III,  2 | destructive.) This shows that the sense is a ratio.~That is also
145 III,  2 |           also why the objects of sense are (1) pleasant when the
146 III,  2 |     either warmed or chilled: the sense and the ratio are identical:
147 III,  2 |      painful or destructive.~Each sense then is relative to its
148 III,  2 |          different? It must be by sense; for what is before us is
149 III,  2 |           perceived, it moves the sense or thought in this determinate
150 III,  2 |      divided in its being? In one sense, it is what is divided that
151 III,  2 |           at once, but in another sense it does so qua undivided;
152 III,  2 |   separate objects with what in a sense is divided: while so far
153 III,  3 |         of the special objects of sense is always free from error,
154 III,  3 |           of which we do this are sense, opinion, science, intelligence.~
155 III,  3 |           That imagination is not sense is clear from the following
156 III,  3 |         following considerations: Sense is either a faculty or an
157 III,  3 |           e.g. in dreams. (Again, sense is always present, imagination
158 III,  3 |           speech, we do not, when sense functions precisely with
159 III,  3 |         what one in the strictest sense perceives. But what we imagine
160 III,  3 |         of the special objects of sense is never in error or admits
161 III,  3 |         is due to the activity of sense in these three modes of
162 III,  3 |       differ from the activity of sense; (1) the first kind of derived
163 III,  3 |     actual exercise of a power of sense.~As sight is the most highly
164 III,  3 |         the most highly developed sense, the name Phantasia (imagination)
165 III,  3 |           remain in the organs of sense and resemble sensations,
166 III,  4 |          to what is thinkable, as sense is to what is sensible.~
167 III,  4 |           strong stimulation of a sense we are less able to exercise
168 III,  4 |  potentiality, but in a different sense from the potentiality which
169 III,  4 |         we said that mind is in a sense potentially whatever is
170 III,  5 |        which is productive in the sense that it makes them all (
171 III,  5 |        state like light; for in a sense light makes potential colours
172 III,  5 |      actual colours.~Mind in this sense of it is separable, impassible,
173 III,  5 |       because, while mind in this sense is impassible, mind as passive
174 III,  6 |           they are cognized, in a sense, by means of their contraries.
175 III,  6 |          of the definition in the sense of the constitutive essence
176 III,  7 |       actually is. In the case of sense clearly the sensitive faculty
177 III,  7 |       activity in the unqualified sense, i.e. that of what has been
178 III,  7 |    avoidance. E.g.. perceiving by sense that the beacon is fire,
179 III,  7 |         of the general faculty of sense that it signifies an enemy,
180 III,  8 |          is the form of forms and sense the form of sensible things.~
181 III,  8 |        anything in the absence of sense, and (when the mind is actively
182 III,  9 |           the work of thought and sense, and (b) the faculty of
183 III,  9 |       originating local movement. Sense and mind we have now sufficiently
184 III,  9 |          presents itself, in what sense we are to speak of parts
185 III,  9 |      should distinguish. For in a sense there is an infinity of
186 III,  10|    possible only in beings with a sense of time (for while mind
187 III,  10|     movement, and appetite in the sense of actual appetite is a
188 III,  11|           sc. those which have no sense but touch, what it is that
189 III,  12|          touch, because it is the sense for what is tangible and
190 III,  13|      impossible to have any other sense; for every body that has
191 III,  13|          can constitute organs of sense, but all of them bring about
192 III,  13|           All the other organs of sense, no doubt, perceive by contact,
193 III,  13|       touch there can be no other sense, and the organ of touch
194 III,  13|         that the loss of this one sense alone must bring about the
195 III,  13|           an animal can have this sense, so on the other it is the
196 III,  13|        but only the organs of the sense (except incidentally, as
197 III,  13|          because this is the only sense which it must have.~All