Book, Paragraph
1 I, 2 | ridiculous proposition and the rest follows-a simple enough
2 I, 3 | ridiculous proposition and the rest follows-a simple enough
3 I, 6 | from these four; of the rest, the next best choice is
4 II, 1 | being moved and of being at rest in that to which it belongs
5 II, 3 | the change or coming to rest; e.g. the man who gave advice
6 II, 3 | the end or the good of the rest; for "that for the sake
7 II, 8 | the end, and since all the rest is for the sake of the end,
8 III, 2 | motion its immobility is rest. For to act on the movable
9 III, 5 | moved or where will it be at rest? For ex hypothesi the place
10 III, 5 | will be the nature of its rest and of its movement, or
11 III, 5 | everywhere-then it will not come to rest.~But if (b) the All has
12 III, 5 | of why the infinite is at rest. He says that the infinite
13 III, 5 | else might be in a state of rest, but there is no reason
14 III, 5 | to be infinite, it is at rest, not because it is infinite,
15 III, 5 | the infinite also would rest in itself, not because it
16 III, 5 | body ought to remain at rest. Just as the infinite remains
17 III, 5 | the infinite remains at rest in itself because it fixes
18 IV, 1 | place-up and down and the rest of the six directions. Nor
19 IV, 4 | consider it in what is at rest and is thus separate but
20 IV, 4 | for the one is always at rest, while the inner side of
21 IV, 8 | is placed in it move, or rest? Much the same argument
22 IV, 8 | reason say the earth is at rest, so, too, in the void things
23 IV, 8 | the void things must be at rest; for there is no place to
24 IV, 8 | thing will either be at rest or must be moved ad infinitum,
25 IV, 8 | degree even if it is at rest; and especially a medium
26 IV, 9 | void exists, but for the rest the problem has been truly
27 IV, 12 | it will be the measure of rest too-indirectly. For all
28 IV, 12 | too-indirectly. For all rest is in time. For it does
29 IV, 12 | motion": and what is at rest, also, can be in the number
30 IV, 12 | motion can be said to be "at rest"-but only that which can
31 IV, 12 | is moved and what is at rest, the one qua moved, the
32 IV, 12 | moved, the other qua at rest; for it will measure their
33 IV, 12 | measure their motion and rest respectively.~Hence what
34 IV, 12 | are neither moved nor at rest are in time: for "to be
35 IV, 12 | the measure of motion and rest.~Plainly, then, neither
36 IV, 12 | will have its existence in rest or motion. Those things
37 V, 1 | which "is not" to be at rest.~There are these difficulties,
38 V, 1 | either another motion or rest, whereas "perishing" is
39 V, 2 | for that it should be at rest, though logically possible,
40 V, 2 | corresponding coming to rest, and a thing that is capable
41 V, 2 | I use the term "being at rest": for rest is contrary to
42 V, 2 | term "being at rest": for rest is contrary to motion, so
43 V, 2 | contrary to motion, so that rest will be negation of motion
44 V, 2 | essential nature of motion and rest, the number of kinds of
45 V, 4 | of motion there must be rest, and a motion that includes
46 V, 4 | that includes intervals of rest will be not one but many,
47 V, 5 | similarly how it is with rest. And we have first to decide
48 V, 6 | motion but also a state of rest, we must determine how this
49 V, 6 | for an opposite a state of rest (for rest is the privation
50 V, 6 | opposite a state of rest (for rest is the privation of motion
51 V, 6 | kind has for its opposite rest of that kind, e.g. local
52 V, 6 | e.g. local motion has local rest. This statement, however,
53 V, 6 | and not opposite states of rest. States of rest in contraries
54 V, 6 | states of rest. States of rest in contraries are opposed.
55 V, 6 | take an example, a state of rest in health is (1) contrary
56 V, 6 | contrary to a state of rest in disease, and (2) the
57 V, 6 | that in which a thing is at rest is rather a coming to rest,
58 V, 6 | rest is rather a coming to rest, the coming to rest being
59 V, 6 | coming to rest, the coming to rest being found to come into
60 V, 6 | motions it must be. And (1) rest in whiteness is of course
61 V, 6 | of course not contrary to rest in health.~Of all things
62 V, 6 | absence of change a state of rest? If it is, then either it
63 V, 6 | true that every state of rest is contrary to a motion
64 V, 6 | of change is a state of rest: we must say that it is
65 V, 6 | is similar to a state of rest and call it absence of change.
66 V, 6 | Now motions and states of rest universally exhibit contrariety
67 V, 6 | e.g. upward motion and rest above are respectively contrary
68 V, 6 | contrary to downward motion and rest below, these being instances
69 V, 6 | arises, has every state of rest that is not permanent a
70 V, 6 | becoming of that which is at rest unnaturally, e.g. of earth
71 V, 6 | unnaturally, e.g. of earth at rest above: and therefore this
72 V, 6 | it will he in a state of rest without having become so.
73 V, 6 | discarded, so that if a state of rest is itself contrary to the
74 V, 6 | motion from the state of rest to its contrary, the contraries
75 V, 6 | contrary, the contraries rest and motion will be simultaneously
76 V, 6 | stationary it is in a state of rest in a qualified sense? For,
77 V, 6 | motion than in a state of rest.~With regard to motion and
78 V, 6 | With regard to motion and rest, then, we have now explained
79 V, 6 | is an opposite state of rest to unnatural as well as
80 V, 6 | a non-permanent state of rest without having become so.
81 V, 6 | in an unnatural state of rest. Further, some things have
82 V, 6 | sense in which a state of rest and a motion are opposites.]~ ~
83 VI, 1 | through, it neither was at rest nor had completed its passage
84 VI, 1 | everything must be either at rest or in motion, and O is therefore
85 VI, 1 | motion, and O is therefore at rest in each of the sections
86 VI, 1 | thing can be continuously at rest and at the same time in
87 VI, 1 | over the whole ABG and at rest in any part (and consequently
88 VI, 1 | be not in motion but at rest, while if they are not motions,
89 VI, 3 | Nor can anything be at rest in a present: for, as we
90 VI, 3 | were saying, only can be at rest which is naturally designed
91 VI, 3 | clear that nothing can be at rest in a present either.~Moreover,
92 VI, 3 | throughout one time and to be at rest throughout the other, and
93 VI, 3 | which is in motion or at rest for the whole of a time
94 VI, 3 | will be in motion or at rest as the case may be in any
95 VI, 3 | designed to be in motion or at rest: this being so, the assumption
96 VI, 3 | that there can be motion or rest in a present will carry
97 VI, 3 | can at the same time be at rest and in motion: for both
98 VI, 3 | we say that a thing is at rest, we imply that its condition
99 VI, 3 | consequently, there can be no rest in it.~It follows then that
100 VI, 3 | which is in motion and the rest of that which is at rest
101 VI, 3 | rest of that which is at rest must occupy time.~
102 VI, 5 | likewise in the case of the rest.~Moreover, if we take each
103 VI, 5 | the changing thing is at rest in the whole preceding time
104 VI, 5 | may suppose that it is at rest), it is at rest in A also:
105 VI, 5 | it is at rest), it is at rest in A also: so if AD is without
106 VI, 5 | will simultaneously be at rest and have changed: for it
107 VI, 5 | have changed: for it is at rest in A and has changed in
108 VI, 6 | two parts, it will be at rest in the whole: for it is
109 VI, 7 | the same with coming to rest as with motion. And so it
110 VI, 7 | of motion or of coming to rest, whether the motion is regular
111 VI, 8 | everything to which motion or rest is natural is in motion
112 VI, 8 | natural is in motion or at rest in the natural time, place,
113 VI, 8 | in motion it must be at rest: but that which is at rest
114 VI, 8 | rest: but that which is at rest cannot be coming to rest.
115 VI, 8 | rest cannot be coming to rest. From this it evidently
116 VI, 8 | time at which the being at rest of that which is at rest
117 VI, 8 | rest of that which is at rest occurred: for it cannot
118 VI, 8 | indivisible, and that in which rest takes place is the same
119 VI, 8 | for we defined a state of rest to be the state of a thing
120 VI, 8 | of the phrase "being at rest" also implies that the previous
121 VI, 8 | that in which a thing is at rest cannot be without parts.
122 VI, 8 | and the thing must be at rest in every one of its parts,
123 VI, 8 | and the reason is that rest and motion are always in
124 VI, 8 | period of time, it is at rest: for it is in just these
125 VI, 8 | we use the term "being at rest"-when at one moment after
126 VI, 8 | So if this is being at rest it is impossible for that
127 VI, 8 | stationary: but it is not at rest: for at a moment it is not
128 VI, 8 | be either in motion or at rest. So while it is true to
129 VI, 8 | against that which is at rest: for that would involve
130 VI, 8 | which is in locomotion is at rest.~
131 VI, 9 | occupies an equal space is at rest, and if that which is in
132 VI, 9 | that the flying arrow is at rest, which result follows from
133 VI, 9 | of equal size that is at rest; which is false. For instance (
134 VI, 9 | motion can be nothing but rest, on the ground that such
135 VI, 9 | they will be at once at rest and in motion. For in the
136 VI, 9 | the thing will never be at rest. And it is the same with
137 VI, 10 | being so, it will be at rest: for, as we saw, to be in
138 VI, 10 | period of time is to be at rest. So it is not possible for
139 VII, 1 | because something else is at rest, but a thing must be moved
140 VII, 1 | motion causes it to be at rest. Thus, if this is accepted,
141 VII, 1 | in motion while BG is at rest, and thus AB cannot be in
142 VII, 1 | in motion AB will be at rest. But we have agreed that
143 VII, 1 | agreed that that which is at rest if something else is not
144 VII, 1 | motion the whole must be at rest.~Since everything that is
145 VII, 3 | intellect has reached a state of rest and come to a standstill,
146 VII, 3 | that leads to a state of rest, since, as we have said
147 VII, 3 | down and come to a state of rest for the performance of some
148 VIII, 1 | things were together and at rest for an infinite period of
149 VIII, 1 | many out of one, and at rest in the intermediate periods
150 VIII, 1 | be,~Thus have they ever Rest upon their round":~ ~for
151 VIII, 1 | only something that is at rest, then this thing that is
152 VIII, 1 | then this thing that is at rest must previously have been
153 VIII, 1 | have been some cause of its rest, rest being the privation
154 VIII, 1 | some cause of its rest, rest being the privation of motion.
155 VIII, 1 | time there is a state of rest. Probably also those who
156 VIII, 1 | there is first a state of rest for an infinite time, and
157 VIII, 1 | universe is alternately at rest and in motion: for in a
158 VIII, 2 | question) not in motion but at rest, are at some moment set
159 VIII, 2 | ever in a state of absolute rest, we have a motionless thing
160 VIII, 2 | possibly be in motion or at rest.~Of these objections, then,
161 VIII, 2 | things are not always at rest, and the rest always in
162 VIII, 2 | always at rest, and the rest always in motion?~The third
163 VIII, 2 | thus an animal is first at rest and afterwards walks, not
164 VIII, 3 | motion and at another are at rest again? Now one of three
165 VIII, 3 | all things are always at rest, or all things are always
166 VIII, 3 | in motion and others at rest: and in this last case again
167 VIII, 3 | and the things that are at rest are always at rest, or they
168 VIII, 3 | are at rest are always at rest, or they are all constituted
169 VIII, 3 | capable alike of motion and of rest; or there is yet a third
170 VIII, 3 | maintain that all things are at rest, and to disregard sense-perception
171 VIII, 3 | physics it was laid down that rest no less than motion is ultimately
172 VIII, 3 | all things are always at rest.~Nor again can it be that
173 VIII, 3 | some things are always at rest, others always in motion,
174 VIII, 3 | and nothing sometimes at rest and sometimes in motion.
175 VIII, 3 | impossible that a thing can be at rest before being set in motion
176 VIII, 3 | occasional motion and occasional rest.~We have now to take the
177 VIII, 3 | things are sometimes at rest and sometimes in motion
178 VIII, 3 | Either all things are at rest, or all things are in motion,
179 VIII, 3 | motion, or some things are at rest and others in motion. And
180 VIII, 3 | And if some things are at rest and others in motion, then
181 VIII, 3 | things are sometimes at rest and sometimes in motion,
182 VIII, 3 | some things are always at rest and the remainder always
183 VIII, 3 | the things are always at rest and others always in motion
184 VIII, 3 | others again are sometimes at rest and sometimes in motion.
185 VIII, 3 | all things should be at rest: nevertheless we may now
186 VIII, 3 | the remainder always at rest. We have sufficient ground
187 VIII, 3 | motion and sometimes at rest. It is evident, therefore,
188 VIII, 3 | the remainder always at rest than that all things should
189 VIII, 3 | all things should be at rest or that all things should
190 VIII, 3 | in motion and of being at rest, or whether, while some
191 VIII, 3 | constituted, some are always at rest and some are always in motion:
192 VIII, 5 | from something that is at rest or from itself. But if there
193 VIII, 6 | motion and sometimes at rest. This fact has served above
194 VIII, 6 | or that all things are at rest or that some things are
195 VIII, 6 | some things are always at rest and the remainder always
196 VIII, 6 | motion and sometimes at rest. The existence of things
197 VIII, 6 | every animal while it is at rest and not in motion in respect
198 VIII, 6 | it to be at one time at rest and at another time in motion.~
199 VIII, 6 | being either in motion or at rest, or some things being always
200 VIII, 6 | the remainder always at rest, there are things that are
201 VIII, 7 | previously have been at rest so far as that motion is
202 VIII, 7 | contraries will be states of rest. And we have a similar result
203 VIII, 7 | matter if the thing need not rest in the contradictory state,
204 VIII, 7 | if there is no state of rest as a contrary to the process
205 VIII, 7 | the non-existent is not at rest, and that perishing is a
206 VIII, 7 | will be contrary both to rest and to motion in the contrary
207 VIII, 7 | opposite both of a state of rest and of the contrary motion,
208 VIII, 8 | A will be in a state of rest at B, and similarly at all
209 VIII, 8 | enumerated, and the state of rest that it undergoes is one
210 VIII, 8 | undergoing the state of rest that is the opposite of
211 VIII, 8 | the motion, the state of rest being privation of motion;
212 VIII, 8 | there must occur a state of rest at G: for this, as we found,
213 VIII, 8 | we found, is the state of rest that is the opposite of
214 VIII, 9 | so, since in all of them rest must occur and with the
215 VIII, 9 | and with the occurrence of rest the motion has perished.
216 VIII, 9 | it must be in a state of rest). On the other hand in circular
217 VIII, 9 | motion, is also in a sense at rest, for it continues to occupy
218 VIII, 9 | locomotion can be in a state of rest as having traversed its
219 VIII, 9 | is in a sense always at rest as well as continuously
220 VIII, 9 | farther from its position of rest: on the other hand rotatory
221 VIII, 9 | alteration while remaining at rest in the same place, we say
222 VIII, 10| motion and sometimes at rest, and the motion is not continuous
|