Book, Paragraph
1 I, 2 | indeed, a difficulty about part and whole, perhaps not relevant
2 I, 2 | account-namely, whether the part and the whole are one or
3 I, 7 | as "to be unmusical". One part survives, the other does
4 I, 9 | it were. But the negative part of the contrariety may often
5 II, 2 | imitates nature, and it is the part of the same discipline to
6 II, 2 | this is so, it would be the part of physics also to know
7 II, 5 | and others for the most part. It is clearly of neither
8 II, 5 | always, or for the most part. But as there is a third
9 II, 5 | true or true for the most part, whereas chance belongs
10 II, 8 | place always or for the most part, it is not incidental or
11 III, 4 | Anaxagoras held that any part is a mixture in the same
12 III, 4 | time.~Democritus, for his part, asserts the contrary, namely
13 III, 4 | all things, differing from part to part in size and in shape.~
14 III, 4 | differing from part to part in size and in shape.~It
15 III, 4 | should there be body in one part of the void rather than
16 III, 5 | substance and principle. For any part of it that is taken will
17 III, 5 | infinites. (Yet just as part of air is air, so a part
18 III, 5 | part of air is air, so a part of the infinite would be
19 III, 5 | to each, the same for the part and for the whole, e.g.
20 III, 5 | is homogeneous. Then each part will be either immovable
21 III, 5 | emerges at the same time. Any part of the infinite body ought
22 III, 5 | fixes itself, so too any part of it you may take will
23 III, 5 | of the whole and of the part are alike, e.g. of the whole
24 III, 5 | will be appropriate to the part. Therefore it will remain
25 III, 5 | the infinite have the one part up and the other down, or
26 III, 6 | if we take a determinate part of a finite magnitude and
27 III, 6 | magnitude and add another part determined by the same ratio (
28 III, 6 | increase the ratio of the part, so as always to take in
29 III, 6 | there will be a smaller part.~But in respect of addition
30 III, 6 | always possible to take a part which is outside a given
31 III, 6 | which is outside a given part. The description depends
32 III, 6 | necessary also that the next part which is taken should never
33 III, 6 | it is only the adjacent part from which the new part
34 III, 6 | part from which the new part is different.~Our definition
35 III, 6 | that we can always take a part outside what has been already
36 III, 6 | stands in the relation of part rather than of whole. For
37 III, 6 | whole. For the matter is part of the whole, as the bronze
38 III, 8 | in the sense that each part that is taken passes in
39 IV, 2 | of a thing is neither a part nor a state of it, but is
40 IV, 2 | place. But the vessel is no part of the thing.~In so far
41 IV, 3 | the hand and generally the part "in" the whole.~(2) As the
42 IV, 3 | species and generally the part of the specific form "in"
43 IV, 3 | since the vessel is no part of what is in it (what contains
44 IV, 4 | the place.~(2) Place is no part of the thing.~(3) The immediate
45 IV, 4 | not mean it is in every part of the air, but that it
46 IV, 4 | sense of in place, but as a part in a whole. But when the
47 IV, 4 | this surface is neither a part of what is in it nor yet
48 IV, 4 | separate it is described as a part in a whole, as the pupil
49 IV, 4 | together will play the same part in the whole which was previously
50 IV, 4 | a different place of the part, in which it is moved, when
51 IV, 4 | they come to be, which is part of the place which is the
52 IV, 4 | what contains plays the part of a vessel rather than
53 IV, 4 | direction of the outermost part of the universe, and the
54 IV, 4 | universe, and the outermost part itself, are up.~For this
55 IV, 5 | will be moved (for one part is contained in another),
56 IV, 5 | are: for on the orb one part contains another. That is
57 IV, 5 | another. That is why the upper part is moved in a circle, while
58 IV, 5 | same as the heaven. It is part of it, the innermost part
59 IV, 5 | part of it, the innermost part of it, which is in contact
60 IV, 5 | its proper place. For this part has the same relation to
61 IV, 5 | its place, as a separable part to its whole, as when one
62 IV, 5 | whole, as when one moves a part of water or air: so, too,
63 IV, 5 | related to air in a way as part to whole. That is why these
64 IV, 7 | either not any and every part of the body is increased,
65 IV, 7 | it is increased in every part and is increased by means
66 IV, 8 | separate and permanent; for a part of it, unless it be placed
67 IV, 8 | to H, A will traverse the part O of A. And it will surely
68 IV, 8 | it will move through any part of the void, this impossible
69 IV, 8 | fill the same place, as the part of place or of the void
70 IV, 9 | outwards and make the outermost part bulge, or that somewhere
71 IV, 9 | space does not acquire a new part which is convex, but what
72 IV, 9 | been contracted; and as any part of fire that one takes will
73 IV, 10 | and in an obscure way. One part of it has been and is not,
74 IV, 10 | others have to be, and no part of it is though it is divisible.
75 IV, 10 | For what is "now" is not a part: a part is a measure of
76 IV, 10 | is "now" is not a part: a part is a measure of the whole,
77 IV, 10 | the sphere itself.~(1) Yet part, too, of the revolution
78 IV, 10 | revolution: for what is taken is part of a revolution, not a revolution.
79 IV, 11 | obviously the "now" is no part of time nor the section
80 IV, 11 | time nor the section any part of the movement, any more
81 IV, 12 | latter means either what is a part or mode of number-in general,
82 IV, 13 | or "just" refers to the part of future time which is
83 IV, 13 | so is near), and to the part of past time which is not
84 IV, 13 | Lately", too, refers to the part of past time which is near
85 V, 1 | statements which refer to part of the thing in question:
86 V, 1 | chest, that is to say a part of the whole body, is restored
87 V, 1 | colour, because white is a part of colour, or to Europe,
88 V, 1 | Europe, because Athens is a part of Europe; but it changes
89 V, 4 | that is not such that any part of it taken at random fits
90 V, 6 | whenever a thing is in motion, part of it is at the starting-point
91 V, 6 | the starting-point while part is at the goal to which
92 VI, 1 | distinct from some other part) nor together (since that
93 VI, 1 | in contact with whole or part with part or part with whole.
94 VI, 1 | with whole or part with part or part with whole. But
95 VI, 1 | whole or part with part or part with whole. But since indivisibles
96 VI, 1 | B, G, each corresponding part of the motion DEZ of O over
97 VI, 1 | whole ABG and at rest in any part (and consequently in the
98 VI, 2 | the whole of which it is a part, and if an equal magnitude
99 VI, 2 | one direction: for as the part will be passed over in less
100 VI, 2 | occupied in traversing this part must be finite, the limit
101 VI, 3 | extremity of the past (no part of the future being on this
102 VI, 3 | and also of the future (no part of the past being on the
103 VI, 3 | divisible, there will be part of the past in the future
104 VI, 3 | the past in the future and part of the future in the past:
105 VI, 3 | Furthermore, there will be a part of the present that is past
106 VI, 3 | present that is past and a part that is future, and it will
107 VI, 3 | will not always be the same part that is past or future:
108 VI, 3 | as the case may be in any part of it in which it is naturally
109 VI, 3 | condition in whole and in part is at the time of speaking
110 VI, 4 | which is in whole and in part in an unvarying condition
111 VI, 4 | follows, therefore, that part of that which is changing
112 VI, 4 | at the starting-point and part at the goal: for as a whole
113 VI, 4 | DE be the motion of the part AB and EZ the motion of
114 VI, 4 | and EZ the motion of the part BG. Then the whole DZ must
115 VI, 5 | impossible to suppose that one part of AG contains the process
116 VI, 5 | must have changed in every part of it (for if it has changed
117 VI, 5 | therefore have changed in every part). It is evident, then, that
118 VI, 5 | changed there is no primary part that has changed. For suppose
119 VI, 5 | suppose that of AE the primary part that has changed is AZ (
120 VI, 5 | the time there will be a part that has changed, less than
121 VI, 5 | again there will be another part prior to this, and yet another,
122 VI, 5 | there cannot be any primary part that has changed. It is
123 VI, 5 | changes is there any primary part.~With regard, however, to
124 VI, 5 | divisible have no primary part. Take the case of magnitudes:
125 VI, 6 | must be changing in any part of the primary time in which
126 VI, 6 | in motion in a time in no part of which it is in motion.
127 VI, 6 | have been in motion in any part of ChRh.~And now that this
128 VI, 6 | time and in fact in any part of it: for as soon as any
129 VI, 6 | changing or have changed in any part of the time of its change,
130 VI, 6 | infinitely divided so that one part is continually increasing
131 VI, 6 | else, that is to say, some part of the thing in question,
132 VI, 6 | represented by any particular part of space or time which the
133 VI, 7 | that the same motion or a part of it is continually repeated,
134 VI, 7 | finite time. For if we take a part of the motion which shall
135 VI, 7 | completing the aforesaid part multiplied by the number
136 VI, 7 | infinite time. Now if one part of the stretch must have
137 VI, 7 | traversed before another part (this is clear, that in
138 VI, 7 | earlier and in the later part of the time a different
139 VI, 7 | of the time a different part of the stretch has been
140 VI, 7 | time lengthens a different part of the motion will always
141 VI, 7 | let us then take AE a part of the whole stretch of
142 VI, 7 | measure of AB. Now this part of the motion occupies a
143 VI, 7 | if again I take another part equal to AE, that also must
144 VI, 7 | the one hand there is no part which will be a measure
145 VI, 7 | irregular. For if we take a part which shall be a measure
146 VI, 7 | the whole time, in this part a certain fraction, not
147 VI, 7 | Again, in another equal part of the time another part
148 VI, 7 | part of the time another part of the magnitude will be
149 VI, 7 | traversed: and similarly in each part of the time that we take,
150 VI, 7 | equal or unequal to the part originally taken. It makes
151 VI, 7 | as that given above: in part of the time it will traverse
152 VI, 7 | magnitude and in each several part likewise, so that in the
153 VI, 7 | magnitude A is in motion a part of it, say GD, will occupy
154 VI, 8 | coming to a stand in any part of the primary time in which
155 VI, 8 | have been already moved for part of the time of its movement:
156 VI, 8 | there can be no primary part of the time: and the reason
157 VI, 8 | period of time has no primary part any more than a magnitude
158 VI, 8 | the whole and not merely a part of the time in question-it
159 VI, 8 | divisible), so that in one part of it after another it will
160 VI, 10 | locomotion of the boat, or a part may be in motion in virtue
161 VI, 10 | case of the motion of a part is not exactly parallel):
162 VII, 1 | not evident which is the part that is moving it and which
163 VII, 1 | moving it and which the part that is moved. In the second
164 VII, 1 | always be divisible, and if a part of it is not in motion the
165 VII, 2 | thing must be pulling one part of the thing and pushing
166 VII, 2 | thing and pushing another part, since it impels one part
167 VII, 2 | part, since it impels one part away from itself and another
168 VII, 2 | from itself and another part towards itself. If, therefore,
169 VII, 2 | causes increase: for the part of the latter that starts
170 VII, 2 | decrease is caused by a part of the thing becoming detached.
171 VII, 3 | alteration of the sensitive part of the soul, and this is
172 VII, 3 | alterations of the sensitive part, it is evident that the
173 VII, 3 | states of the intellectual part of the soul are not alterations,
174 VII, 3 | things and in the sensitive part of the soul, and, except
175 VII, 4 | consequently there will be a part of A in which B will pass
176 VII, 4 | which B will pass over a part of the circle equal to G’,
177 VII, 5 | it cause B to traverse a part of G the ratio between which
178 VII, 5 | argues that there is no part of the millet that does
179 VII, 5 | is no reason why any such part should not in any length
180 VII, 5 | as it would move if this part were by itself: for no part
181 VII, 5 | part were by itself: for no part even exists otherwise than
182 VIII, 2 | whether the whole or some part is in question) not in motion
183 VIII, 2 | that there is always some part of the animal’s organism
184 VIII, 2 | cause of the motion of this part is not the animal itself,
185 VIII, 3 | opinions, since motion plays a part in all of them. Further,
186 VIII, 3 | so much in motion, but a part of them will not set as
187 VIII, 3 | does not follow that some part must always be passing away:
188 VIII, 4 | belongs to or contains as a part a thing that causes motion
189 VIII, 4 | thing or containing it as a part.~Of things to which the
190 VIII, 4 | thing is divided that one part of it is by nature active
191 VIII, 5 | thing moves itself it is one part of it that is the movent
192 VIII, 5 | is the movent and another part that is moved. But it is
193 VIII, 5 | parts is moved by the other part: the following considerations
194 VIII, 5 | necessity for the movent part to be moved by anything
195 VIII, 5 | accidentally that the other part moves it in return. I take
196 VIII, 5 | it: then there will be a part that is moved and a part
197 VIII, 5 | part that is moved and a part that is an unmoved movent.
198 VIII, 5 | contain either a single part that moves itself or a number
199 VIII, 5 | be moved either by some part of itself or as a whole
200 VIII, 5 | moved in virtue of some part of it being moved by that
201 VIII, 5 | of it being moved by that part itself, it is this part
202 VIII, 5 | part itself, it is this part that will be the primary
203 VIII, 5 | self-movent, since, if this part is separated from the whole,
204 VIII, 5 | separated from the whole, the part will still move itself,
205 VIII, 5 | through being moved by any part of itself. So only AB moves
206 VIII, 5 | that it is not through some part of the whole being of such
207 VIII, 5 | motion through containing a part that imparts motion and
208 VIII, 5 | that imparts motion and a part that is moved. It does not
209 VIII, 5 | substance), or from B the part that is moved, will the
210 VIII, 8 | starting-point of the latter part and the finishing-point
211 VIII, 8 | finishing-point of the first part of the motion. This is the
212 VIII, 8 | motions, not some particular part of the whole motion) must
213 VIII, 10| suppose that D moves E, a part of B. Then the time occupied
214 VIII, 10| Consequently the duration of the part of G which is occupied by
|