Book, Paragraph
1 I, 4 | remainder by repeating the process of separation: then, even
2 I, 4 | magnitude. If, therefore, the process comes to an end, everything
3 I, 5 | comes to be by a natural process is either a contrary or
4 I, 7 | it survives through the process, in the other (2) it does
5 I, 7 | contrary are incidental in the process.) And the positive form
6 II, 1 | continuously through the process of making.~But if the material
7 II, 1 | as being exhibited in the process of growth by which its nature
8 II, 9 | what is of necessity in the process of production, just as if
9 III, 1 | buildable as buildable is the process of building. For the actuality
10 III, 1 | which is being built. The process then of being built must
11 III, 4 | being gone through, the process however having no termination,
12 III, 6 | substance, but consists in a process of coming to be or passing
13 III, 7 | is not separable from the process of bisection, and its infinity
14 III, 7 | actuality but consists in a process of coming to be, like time
15 V, 1 | its name to a particular process of change. Thus "perishing"
16 V, 2 | simple becoming was ever in process of becoming, then that which
17 V, 2 | simple becoming was also in process of becoming, so that we
18 V, 2 | have arrived at what was in process of simple becoming but only
19 V, 2 | only at what was already in process of becoming in process of
20 V, 2 | in process of becoming in process of becoming. And this again
21 V, 2 | this again was sometime in process of becoming, so that even
22 V, 2 | have arrived at what was in process of simple becoming. And
23 V, 2 | becoming, that which is in process of becoming is in process
24 V, 2 | process of becoming is in process of perishing at the very
25 V, 2 | becoming: since it cannot be in process of perishing when it is
26 V, 2 | become: for that which is in process of perishing must be in
27 V, 2 | can the becoming of any process be that process.~Finally,
28 V, 2 | becoming of any process be that process.~Finally, since there are
29 V, 3 | least three things: for in a process of change it is the contrary
30 V, 5 | contraries. On the other hand, a process simply to a contrary, e.g.
31 VI, 1 | through A after being in process of passing through, the
32 VI, 2 | And we can carry on this process for ever, taking the slower
33 VI, 4 | which comes first in the process of change: e.g. in a process
34 VI, 4 | process of change: e.g. in a process of change from white the
35 VI, 5 | part of AG contains the process and the other the completion
36 VI, 5 | containing the completion of the process of change—the moment when
37 VI, 5 | containing the beginning of the process of change. Now the primary
38 VI, 5 | thing as a beginning of a process of change, and the time
39 VI, 5 | the other hand, it is in process of change in both parts,
40 VI, 5 | parts, it is likewise in process of change in the whole:
41 VI, 5 | to be observed. For in a process of change we may distinguish
42 VI, 5 | to infinity, because the process of division may be continued
43 VI, 6 | must have changed, and a process of change is preceded by
44 VI, 6 | change and a completion by a process: and we can never take any
45 VI, 6 | therefore in change the process of division is infinite,
46 VI, 6 | previously have been in process of becoming, and that which
47 VI, 6 | becoming, and that which is in process of becoming must previously
48 VI, 6 | actual thing that is in process of becoming of which this
49 VI, 6 | so a thing cannot be in process of becoming without having
50 VI, 6 | become without having been in process of becoming. So, too, in
51 VI, 6 | previously have been in process of becoming, and that which
52 VI, 6 | becoming, and that which is in process of becoming must previously
53 VI, 7 | thing to be infinitely in process of becoming or of perishing.
54 VI, 7 | thus exhausted, since the process of subtraction is finite
55 VI, 8 | period of time, and the process of coming to a stand may
56 VI, 10 | is that the change is in process. It remains, then, that
57 VI, 10 | Our next point is that no process of change is infinite: for
58 VI, 10 | extreme points of any such process of change, and consequently
59 VI, 10 | and consequently of every process of alteration: for alteration
60 VI, 10 | cannot be cut should be in process of being cut, and generally
61 VI, 10 | come to be should be in process of coming to be, it follows
62 VI, 10 | complete a change should be in process of changing to that to which
63 VI, 10 | which is in locomotion is in process of changing, it must be
64 VI, 10 | is evident, then, that a process of change cannot be infinite
65 VI, 10 | sense that one and the same process of change may be infinite
66 VI, 10 | occupies. If it is not one process, it would seem that there
67 VI, 10 | in this sense; e.g. if a process of locomotion be succeeded
68 VI, 10 | locomotion be succeeded by a process of alteration and that by
69 VI, 10 | alteration and that by a process of increase and that again
70 VI, 10 | increase and that again by a process of coming to be: in this
71 VI, 10 | one. If it is to be one process, no motion can be infinite
72 VII, 2 | unconscious of it when the process of the alteration does not
73 VIII, 1 | worlds, some of which are in process of becoming while others
74 VIII, 1 | becoming while others are in process of perishing, assert that
75 VIII, 1 | burned before there can be a process of being burned, and something
76 VIII, 1 | burning before there can be a process of burning. Moreover, these
77 VIII, 1 | previously have been in process of change: for there must
78 VIII, 1 | motion was not always in process, it is clear that they must
79 VIII, 1 | of them must have been in process of change: for in what is
80 VIII, 1 | both, must have been in process of change. It follows then,
81 VIII, 1 | then, that there will be a process of change previous to the
82 VIII, 1 | saw, the existence of a process of change previous to the
83 VIII, 1 | involve the existence of a process of change subsequent to
84 VIII, 1 | g. the cessation of the process of being burned does not
85 VIII, 1 | burned without being in process of being burned-nor, when
86 VIII, 1 | so that there will be a process of change subsequent to
87 VIII, 2 | it may be said that no process of change is eternal: for
88 VIII, 2 | something, so that every process of change must be bounded
89 VIII, 3 | there cannot be a continuous process either of increase or of
90 VIII, 3 | health is in the future: the process of change cannot take place
91 VIII, 4 | continues to rise higher. The process whereby what is of a certain
92 VIII, 5 | heating, I mean, is itself in process of becoming hot, that which
93 VIII, 5 | which is making healthy in process of becoming healthy, and
94 VIII, 5 | is causing locomotion in process of locomotion, or else that
95 VIII, 5 | healthy is, let us say, in process of locomotion, and that
96 VIII, 5 | is causing locomotion in process of, say, increase. But it
97 VIII, 5 | geometry, he is also in process of being taught that same
98 VIII, 5 | he is throwing he is in process of being thrown in just
99 VIII, 5 | causing locomotion is in process of increase, that which
100 VIII, 5 | causing this increase is in process of being altered by something
101 VIII, 5 | causing this alteration is in process of suffering some different
102 VIII, 5 | and if we say that the process is reversible, and that
103 VIII, 5 | causing alteration is in process of locomotion, we do no
104 VIII, 5 | causing locomotion is in process of locomotion, and that
105 VIII, 5 | one who is teaching is in process of being taught: for it
106 VIII, 5 | one who is teaching is in process of learning what he is teaching,
107 VIII, 5 | but the potential is in process to actuality, and motion
108 VIII, 6 | and not to be, without any process of becoming and perishing (
109 VIII, 6 | should without undergoing any process of change at one time be
110 VIII, 6 | eternity and continuity of the process cannot be caused either
111 VIII, 6 | not and of the continuous process of change: and this causes
112 VIII, 7 | something else that is in process of locomotion to be the
113 VIII, 7 | without itself being in process of becoming, as e.g. the
114 VIII, 7 | Thirdly, that which is in process of becoming appears universally
115 VIII, 7 | things that go through the process of becoming acquire locomotion
116 VIII, 7 | essential character less in the process of locomotion than in any
117 VIII, 7 | locomotion is primary. The same process of reasoning will also make
118 VIII, 7 | rest as a contrary to the process of change: it may be true
119 VIII, 7 | and that perishing is a process to the non-existent. All
120 VIII, 8 | of everything that is in process of locomotion is either
121 VIII, 8 | When to A, that which is in process of locomotion, B, the middle-point,
122 VIII, 8 | whole of A not-white was in process of becoming and white of
123 VIII, 8 | white of perishing, at G the process is complete. And so G is
124 VIII, 8 | addition to having been in process of becoming white is no
125 VIII, 8 | it occupied in the mere process of becoming white.~These
126 VIII, 8 | been previously also in process of locomotion to that point,
127 VIII, 8 | thing must also have been in process of locomotion to B, and
128 VIII, 8 | have a thing that is in process of change from a position
129 VIII, 8 | from white is a continuous process and the white does not remain
130 VIII, 8 | intermediate stages of the process, and in quantitative change
131 VIII, 8 | intermediate stages of the process to be few or many, or whether
132 VIII, 8 | becoming and perishing as a process of alteration. On the other
133 VIII, 8 | position that there is no process of change that admits of
134 VIII, 9 | at which that which is in process of locomotion can be in
135 VIII, 9 | place: if a thing is in process of increase or decrease
136 VIII, 10| say it will itself be in process of change and in being so
137 VIII, 10| one movent to another (the process that we described before
|