Book, Paragraph
1 III, 3 | Since then they are both motions, we may ask: in what are
2 III, 3 | absurdity, a thing will have two motions at the same time. How will
3 V, 1 | Affections, it may be said, are motions, and whiteness is an affection:
4 V, 1 | of contradiction, are not motions: it necessarily follows
5 V, 4 | touch or come to be one? Motions that are not the same either
6 V, 4 | two things are one. Hence motions may be consecutive or successive
7 V, 4 | continuity only in virtue of the motions themselves being continuous,
8 V, 4 | both regular and irregular, motions that are consecutive but
9 V, 5 | further to determine what motions are contrary to each other,
10 V, 5 | decide whether contrary motions are motions respectively
11 V, 5 | whether contrary motions are motions respectively from and to
12 V, 5 | be and ceasing to be); or motions respectively from contraries,
13 V, 5 | motion from disease; or motions respectively to contraries,
14 V, 5 | a motion to disease; or motions respectively from a contrary
15 V, 5 | a motion to disease; or motions respectively from a contrary
16 V, 5 | from disease to health: for motions must be contrary to one
17 V, 5 | they can be opposed.~Now motions respectively from a contrary
18 V, 5 | disease, are not contrary motions: for they are one and the
19 V, 5 | opposite contrary contrary motions, for a motion from a contrary
20 V, 5 | cause of the contrariety of motions, the latter being the loss,
21 V, 5 | sickening. Thus we are left with motions respectively to contraries,
22 V, 5 | respectively to contraries, and motions respectively to contraries
23 V, 5 | Now it would seem that motions to contraries are at the
24 V, 5 | contraries are at the same time motions from contraries (though
25 V, 5 | it follows that contrary motions are motions respectively
26 V, 5 | that contrary motions are motions respectively from a contrary
27 V, 5 | these are changes and not motions. And wherever a pair of
28 V, 5 | admit of an intermediate, motions to that intermediate must
29 V, 5 | be held to be in a sense motions to one or other of the contraries:
30 V, 5 | above. Thus we see that two motions are contrary to each other
31 V, 6 | that there are contrary motions and not opposite states
32 V, 6 | motion; and one of these two motions it must be. And (1) rest
33 V, 6 | exclude these from among motions, we must not say that this
34 V, 6 | and the other that.~Now motions and states of rest universally
35 V, 6 | the same thing: one of its motions, the upward or the downward,
36 V, 6 | unnatural as well as to natural motions. It would be absurd if this
37 VI, 1 | corresponding indivisible motions: e.g. if the magnitude ABG
38 VI, 1 | motion will consist not of motions but of starts, and will
39 VI, 1 | indivisibles composing DEZ are motions, it would be possible for
40 VI, 1 | rest, while if they are not motions, it would be possible for
41 VI, 1 | of something other than motions.~And if length and motion
42 VI, 2 | and slower may apply to motions occupying any period of
43 VI, 4 | divisible according to the motions of the several parts of
44 VI, 4 | severally constitute the motions of each of its parts. But
45 VI, 4 | parts of the motion are the motions of the parts of that whole:
46 VI, 4 | the parts of DZ are the motions of AB, BG and of nothing
47 VI, 4 | subtracted from it: and these motions will be equal to DE, EZ
48 VI, 4 | may be divided into the motions of the parts, OI will be
49 VI, 4 | surplus on the side of the motions of the parts. Consequently,
50 VI, 4 | motion according to the motions of the parts: and it must
51 VI, 4 | corresponding to each of the two motions DG (say) and GE, we may
52 VI, 4 | thing is divisible into the motions of the parts of the thing:
53 VI, 4 | corresponding to each of the two motions, we shall see that the whole
54 VI, 10 | parallel): for parts have motions belonging essentially and
55 VI, 10 | motion, because all these motions do not compose one. If it
56 VII, 1 | evident that the respective motions of A, B, G, and each of
57 VII, 1 | H and O respectively the motions of G and D: for though they
58 VII, 1 | composed of all the individual motions, must be infinite. For the
59 VII, 1 | must be infinite. For the motions of A, B, and the others
60 VII, 1 | others may be equal, or the motions of the others may be greater:
61 VII, 2 | spitting and of all other motions that proceed through the
62 VII, 4 | None the less, if the two motions are commensurable, we are
63 VII, 4 | and so the corresponding motions are not commensurable either.~
64 VII, 4 | the things to which the motions belong essentially and not
65 VII, 4 | specifically, then their respective motions will also differ specifically:
66 VII, 4 | generically or numerically, the motions also will differ generically
67 VIII, 1 | produce either of two contrary motions: thus fire causes heating
68 VIII, 2 | originates not all of its motions but its locomotion. So it
69 VIII, 2 | necessarily be the case-that many motions are produced in the body
70 VIII, 3 | opinion are thought to be motions of a kind. But to investigate
71 VIII, 4 | not evident whence such motions as the upward motion of
72 VIII, 6 | connected with other natural motions in animals, which they do
73 VIII, 6 | it will produce contrary motions in each several thing that
74 VIII, 7 | must be the last of its motions: for after its becoming
75 VIII, 7 | plain that no one of the motions next in order can be prior
76 VIII, 7 | prior to locomotion. By the motions next in order I mean increase
77 VIII, 7 | of changes that are not motions: for becoming and perishing,
78 VIII, 7 | impossible for the opposite motions or changes to be present
79 VIII, 8 | respective relations to the two motions. Therefore that which turns
80 VIII, 8 | undergoing two contrary motions, since the two motions that
81 VIII, 8 | contrary motions, since the two motions that follow the same straight
82 VIII, 8 | are the opposites of the motions (for we found that there
83 VIII, 8 | various specifically distinct motions, not some particular part
84 VIII, 8 | then, inasmuch as the two motions that follow the same straight
85 VIII, 8 | straight line are contrary motions, and it is impossible for
86 VIII, 8 | simultaneously two contrary motions, that which is undergoing
87 VIII, 8 | two contrary or opposite motions: for a motion to a point
88 VIII, 8 | of place, as e.g. the two motions along the diameter of the
89 VIII, 8 | simultaneously two opposite motions. So, too, there cannot be
90 VIII, 8 | reason is that in these motions the starting-point and the
91 VIII, 8 | must be one or other of the motions just mentioned: in fact
92 VIII, 8 | applying universally to all motions, that no motion admits of
93 VIII, 9 | composite motion, in fact two motions, while if it does not turn
94 VIII, 9 | rotation is the measure of motions it must be the primary motion (
95 VIII, 9 | the measure of all other motions. Again, rotatory motion
96 VIII, 9 | separation" and "combination" are motions in respect of place, and
97 VIII, 9 | subject to any of the other motions, though the things that
98 VIII, 10| simultaneously, so that their motions also cease simultaneously:
99 VIII, 10| consecutive series of separate motions), and that if the movement
100 VIII, 10| a consecutive series of motions. The only continuous motion,
|