Book, Paragraph
1 I, 2 | whitened" instead of "is white", and "walks" instead of "
2 I, 2 | definition (for example "to be white" is one thing, "to be musical"
3 I, 3 | because if we take only white things, and if "white" has
4 I, 3 | only white things, and if "white" has a single meaning, none
5 I, 3 | meaning, none the less what is white will be many and not one.
6 I, 3 | and not one. For what is white will not be one either in
7 I, 3 | over and above what is white. For "whiteness" and "that
8 I, 3 | whiteness" and "that which is white" differ in definition, not
9 I, 3 | that "substance" is also "white". Since the definition of
10 I, 3 | cannot even be attributed to white, as nothing is which is
11 I, 3 | substance"), it follows that "white" is not-being—and that not
12 I, 3 | is true to say that it is white, which we found to mean
13 I, 3 | avoid this we say that even "white" means substance, it follows
14 I, 3 | in "biped", or that of "white man" in "white". If then
15 I, 3 | that of "white man" in "white". If then this is so, and
16 I, 4 | is purely and entirely white or black or sweet, bone
17 I, 4 | place, there would be a "white" or a "healthy" which was
18 I, 4 | healthy" which was nothing but white or healthy, i.e. was not
19 I, 5 | attribute. For how could "white" come from "musical", unless "
20 I, 5 | not-white or of the black? No, "white" comes from "not-white"-
21 I, 5 | the first chance thing; "white" does not pass into "musical" (
22 I, 5 | chance thing which is not white, but into black or an intermediate
23 I, 5 | instance, from black and white. Everything, therefore,
24 I, 6 | example sweet and bitter, white and black-whereas the principles
25 III, 1 | privation; (2) in quality, white and black; (3) in quantity,
26 IV, 3 | e.g. a man is said to be white because the visible surface
27 IV, 3 | visible surface of him is white, or to be scientific because
28 IV, 3 | be in itself, namely, as "white" is in body (for the visible
29 IV, 3 | that the man is called white, &c. But the jar and the
30 IV, 3 | thing will be in itself, as "white" is in man because it is
31 IV, 3 | capacity, "surface" and "white".~Thus if we look at the
32 IV, 4 | formerly black and is now white, or formerly soft and now
33 V, 1 | thing which is becoming white changes accidentally to
34 V, 1 | changes to colour, because white is a part of colour, or
35 V, 1 | it changes essentially to white colour. It is now clear
36 V, 1 | black and dark relatively to white.~And since every change
37 V, 1 | change from not-white to white is a coming to be of the
38 V, 1 | of the particular thing, white, while change from unqualified
39 V, 4 | every other blackening. But white is not further subdivided
40 V, 4 | i.e. it must be one as the white that blackens is one or
41 V, 4 | sense in which Coriscus and white may be one), nor merely
42 V, 5 | the expression "becoming white", where no starting-point
43 V, 5 | in a motion from grey to white takes the place of black
44 V, 5 | starting-point, in a motion from white to grey it takes the place
45 V, 5 | grey it takes the place of white as goal: for the middle
46 VI, 4 | a process of change from white the goal in question will
47 VI, 9 | from not-white, say, to white, and is in neither condition,
48 VI, 9 | then it will be neither white nor not-white: for the fact
49 VI, 9 | preclude us from calling it white or not-white. We call a
50 VI, 9 | not-white. We call a thing white or not-white not necessarily
51 VII, 1 | specifically the same, e.g. from white to black or from good to
52 VII, 1 | e.g. from a particular white to a particular black, or
53 VII, 2 | sweet or thick or dry or white: and we make these assertions
54 VII, 4 | take the form of becoming white and becoming healthy respectively,
55 VII, 4 | quantity of each has become white. Or ought we not rather
56 VIII, 8| ABG and a thing D, D being white in the time A and not-white
57 VIII, 8| Then D is at the moment G white and not-white: for if we
58 VIII, 8| right in saying that it is white during the whole time A,
59 VIII, 8| A, it is true to call it white at any moment of A, and
60 VIII, 8| allow, therefore, that it is white in the whole of A, but must
61 VIII, 8| process of becoming and white of perishing, at G the process
62 VIII, 8| is true to call the thing white or not white respectively.
63 VIII, 8| call the thing white or not white respectively. Otherwise
64 VIII, 8| thing at the same time to be white and not white and in fact
65 VIII, 8| time to be white and not white and in fact to be existent
66 VIII, 8| suppose that D was becoming white in the time A and that at
67 VIII, 8| A, D has already become white and so is white at that
68 VIII, 8| already become white and so is white at that moment: then, inasmuch
69 VIII, 8| the time A it was becoming white and so was not white and
70 VIII, 8| becoming white and so was not white and at the moment B it is
71 VIII, 8| and at the moment B it is white, there must have been a
72 VIII, 8| them D has become and so is white at the last point of the
73 VIII, 8| in which it was becoming white: and this point has no other
74 VIII, 8| clear that if D was becoming white in the whole time A, the
75 VIII, 8| occupied by it in having become white in addition to having been
76 VIII, 8| been in process of becoming white is no more than all that
77 VIII, 8| mere process of becoming white.~These and such-like, then,
78 VIII, 8| not-white and a becoming of white. Then if the alteration
79 VIII, 8| Then if the alteration to white and from white is a continuous
80 VIII, 8| alteration to white and from white is a continuous process
81 VIII, 8| continuous process and the white does not remain any time,
82 VIII, 8| not-white, a becoming of white, and a becoming of not-white:
|