Book, Paragraph
1 I, 1 | qualification. So in the present inquiry we must follow this
2 I, 2 | perhaps not relevant to the present argument, yet deserving
3 I, 4 | i.e. out of things already present, but imperceptible to our
4 I, 4 | divided and which are actually present in it), it is necessary
5 I, 4 | such things are already present in one another and do not
6 I, 4 | bodies there would be already present infinite flesh and blood
7 I, 8 | because something must be present as a substratum). So too
8 II, 1 | All the things mentioned present a feature in which they
9 II, 4 | chance and spontaneity are present among the causes enumerated,
10 II, 4 | separated and arranged in its present order all that exists. This
11 II, 5 | must be made later-for the present it is sufficient if it is
12 II, 5 | getting the money) a cause present in himself-it belongs to
13 II, 8 | Therefore action for an end is present in things which come to
14 II, 8 | suppose that purpose is not present because we do not observe
15 II, 8 | If, therefore, purpose is present in art, it is present also
16 II, 8 | is present in art, it is present also in nature. The best
17 II, 9 | Perhaps the necessary is present also in the definition.
18 III, 3 | actuality of each will not be present in each, and, a second absurdity,
19 III, 4 | yet that the infinite is present not only in the objects
20 III, 5 | whether the infinite can be present in mathematical objects
21 III, 5 | question would have been present in our world here, alongside
22 III, 6 | direction of reduction is not present, as the monad is the smallest;
23 IV, 1 | as from a vessel, air is present. When therefore another
24 IV, 4 | the matter and the shape present themselves along with it,
25 IV, 5 | carefully later. On the present occasion it was necessary
26 IV, 6 | contracts into the voids present in it.~Again (3) increase,
27 IV, 8 | what way will things be present either in place-or in the
28 IV, 8 | in a void this quality is present equally everywhere, so that
29 IV, 9 | separately existent, but still present in the rare, this is less
30 IV, 9 | heat and whiteness are not present. So too, then, is the earlier
31 IV, 10 | chance to be. But time is present equally everywhere and with
32 IV, 10 | need not distinguish at present between "movement" and "
33 IV, 12 | and after, for while the present change is one, the change
34 IV, 13 | is near the indivisible present "now" ("When do you walk? "
35 IV, 13 | past time which is near the present "now". "When did you go?" "
36 V, 2 | What can this be in the present case? It is either the body
37 V, 4 | specifically different (as in the present instance the circular path
38 V, 4 | health at daybreak and at the present moment is one and the same,
39 V, 4 | difficulties lie outside our present inquiry.~Since every motion
40 VI, 2 | follows not only from the present argument but from the consideration
41 VI, 3 | 3~The present also is necessarily indivisible-the
42 VI, 3 | necessarily indivisible-the present, that is, not in the sense
43 VI, 3 | inherent in all time. For the present is something that is an
44 VI, 3 | is indivisible.~Now the present that is the extremity of
45 VI, 3 | Thus on this assumption the present is divisible. But if the
46 VI, 3 | is divisible. But if the present is divisible, there will
47 VI, 3 | point of division. Also the present will be a present not in
48 VI, 3 | Also the present will be a present not in the proper sense
49 VI, 3 | there will be a part of the present that is past and a part
50 VI, 3 | in fact one and the same present will not be simultaneous:
51 VI, 3 | points. If, therefore, the present cannot possibly have these
52 VI, 3 | that it must be the same present that belongs to each of
53 VI, 3 | so it is evident that the present is also indivisible: for
54 VI, 3 | and this is what we call a present.~We will now show that nothing
55 VI, 3 | nothing can be in motion in a present. For if this is possible,
56 VI, 3 | and slower motion in the present. Suppose then that in the
57 VI, 3 | Suppose then that in the present N the quicker has traversed
58 VI, 3 | slower will in the same present traverse a distance less
59 VI, 3 | have occupied the whole present in traversing AG, the quicker
60 VI, 3 | shall have a division of the present, whereas we found it to
61 VI, 3 | anything to be in motion in a present.~Nor can anything be at
62 VI, 3 | anything be at rest in a present: for, as we were saying,
63 VI, 3 | designed to be in motion in a present, it is clear that nothing
64 VI, 3 | nothing can be at rest in a present either.~Moreover, inasmuch
65 VI, 3 | inasmuch as it is the same present that belongs to both the
66 VI, 3 | can be motion or rest in a present will carry with it the implication
67 VI, 3 | same extremity, viz. the present.~Again, when we say that
68 VI, 3 | was previously: but the present contains no "previously":
69 VI, 9 | solve the problems that they present, are four in number. The
70 VII, 1 | makes no difference to our present argument; for in any case
71 VIII, 1 | moved, and when they are present under such conditions as
72 VIII, 2 | without being at one time present, and at another absent.
73 VIII, 2 | objection may be thought to present more difficulty than the
74 VIII, 6 | eternal is irrelevant to our present argument: but the following
75 VIII, 6 | ought, if possible, to be present rather than the reverse:
76 VIII, 7 | be proved later: for the present let us take it for granted),
77 VIII, 7 | impossible for them both to be present to the same thing at the
78 VIII, 7 | the two processes being present to a thing at the same time.
79 VIII, 7 | motions or changes to be present to a thing at the same time.
80 VIII, 8 | the element of infinity is present in the time no less than
81 VIII, 9 | without qualification.~Our present position, then, is this:
82 VIII, 10| simultaneously: but our present problem concerns the appearance
|