Book, Paragraph
1 I, 1 | are acquainted with its primary conditions or first principles,
2 I, 5 | conditions are fulfilled by the primary contraries, which are not
3 I, 5 | anything else because they are primary, nor from each other because
4 I, 5 | contraries which are more primary, others contraries which
5 I, 6 | some contraries are more primary than others, and some arise
6 I, 6 | should be more than one primary contrariety. For substance
7 I, 9 | something must have existed as a primary substratum from which it
8 I, 9 | matter is just this-the primary substratum of each thing,
9 I, 9 | is the province of the primary type of science; so these
10 II, 2 | it is the business of the primary type of philosophy to define.~
11 II, 3 | of (which is to grasp its primary cause). So clearly we too
12 II, 3 | definition.~Again (3) the primary source of the change or
13 II, 7 | which" are one, while the primary source of motion is the
14 II, 7 | to the form, and to the primary moving cause. For in respect
15 II, 7 | after what? what was the primary agent or patient? " and
16 II, 7 | completely unchangeable, the primary reality, and (2) the essence
17 III, 7 | secondary sense depends on its primary sense, i.e. movement is
18 IV, 1 | in its most general and primary sense is change of place,
19 IV, 3 | events centre "in" their primary motive agent.~(7) As the
20 IV, 4 | supposed to be, and which the primary place in which a thing is
21 VI, 3 | another, but in its proper and primary sense; in which sense it
22 VI, 5 | will now show that the "primary when" in which that which
23 VI, 5 | be indivisible, where by "primary" I mean possessing the characteristics
24 VI, 5 | in BG, AG cannot be the primary thing in which the completion
25 VI, 5 | something prior to what is primary. So that in which the completion
26 VI, 5 | senses of the expression "the primary when in which something
27 VI, 5 | one hand it may mean the primary when containing the completion
28 VI, 5 | other hand it may mean the primary when containing the beginning
29 VI, 5 | process of change. Now the primary when that has reference
30 VI, 5 | change does not contain any primary when in which the change
31 VI, 5 | suppose that AD is such a primary when. Then it cannot be
32 VI, 5 | parts, the whole is not the primary when in which it has changed:
33 VI, 5 | beginning of change there is no primary when in which change has
34 VI, 5 | has changed there is no primary part that has changed. For
35 VI, 5 | For suppose that of AE the primary part that has changed is
36 VI, 5 | changes there cannot be any primary part that has changed. It
37 VI, 5 | it changes is there any primary part.~With regard, however,
38 VI, 5 | accidentally, divisible have no primary part. Take the case of magnitudes:
39 VI, 5 | it has moved from B to a primary "where" G. Then if BG is
40 VI, 5 | end. Thus there can be no primary "where" to which a thing
41 VI, 6 | said to change may be the primary time, or on the other hand
42 VI, 6 | changing in any part of the primary time in which it changes.
43 VI, 6 | from our definition of "primary", in which the word is said
44 VI, 6 | argument. Let ChRh be the primary time in which that which
45 VI, 6 | time, ChRh cannot be the primary time in which it is in motion:
46 VI, 6 | traversed the distance KL in the primary time ChRh, in half the time
47 VI, 8 | stand in any part of the primary time in which it is coming
48 VI, 8 | the whole cannot be the primary time in which it is coming
49 VI, 8 | And just as there is no primary time in which that which
50 VI, 8 | motion, so too there is no primary time in which that which
51 VI, 8 | a stand, there being no primary stage either of being in
52 VI, 8 | stand. For let AB be the primary time in which a thing is
53 VI, 8 | Nor again can there be a primary time at which the being
54 VI, 8 | demonstrations.~So there can be no primary part of the time: and the
55 VI, 8 | a period of time has no primary part any more than a magnitude
56 VI, 10| contradictory-and let D be the primary time in which it undergoes
57 VII, 2 | locomotion, for this is the primary motion. Everything that
58 VII, 2 | hearing and smelling: for the primary movent in respect to the
59 VIII, 5| this part that will be the primary self-movent, since, if this
60 VIII, 7| motion is, and which is the primary motion: for it is plain
61 VIII, 7| and a particular motion is primary and continuous, then it
62 VIII, 7| same and continuous and primary.~Now of the three kinds
63 VIII, 7| locomotion, that must be primary. This may be shown as follows.
64 VIII, 7| always be locomotion as the primary motion, and, if there is
65 VIII, 7| motion, and, if there is a primary as distinguished from a
66 VIII, 7| locomotion, it must be the primary form. Again, all affections
67 VIII, 7| seen that locomotion is primary. As in the case of other
68 VIII, 7| case of motion the word "primary" may be used in several
69 VIII, 7| locomotion, locomotion must be primary. For there is no necessity
70 VIII, 7| Secondly, locomotion must be primary in time: for this is the
71 VIII, 7| might be thought to be the primary motion on the ground that
72 VIII, 7| and impart motion and the primary source to which things that
73 VIII, 7| arguments that locomotion is the primary motion. We have now to show
74 VIII, 7| which kind of locomotion is primary. The same process of reasoning
75 VIII, 9| plainly that rotation is the primary locomotion. Every locomotion,
76 VIII, 9| of motions it must be the primary motion (for all things are
77 VIII, 9| are measured by what is primary): on the other hand, because
78 VIII, 9| because rotation is the primary motion it is the measure
79 VIII, 9| to locomotion being the primary motion, this is a truth
80 VIII, 9| are of opinion that the primary substances are not subject
81 VIII, 9| explained further which is the primary motion and which is the
|