Book, Paragraph
1 I, 3 | from horse in form, and contraries from each other.~The same
2 I, 4 | rarefaction. Now these are contraries, which may be generalized
3 I, 4 | underlies as matter and the contraries as differentiae, i.e. forms).~
4 I, 4 | homceomerous" substances and his contraries infinite in multitude, whereas
5 I, 4 | Moreover, the fact that the contraries proceed from each other
6 I, 5 | then agree in making the contraries principles, both those who
7 I, 5 | of which the species are contraries, namely, of position, above
8 I, 5 | or another identify the contraries with the principles. And
9 I, 5 | fulfilled by the primary contraries, which are not derived from
10 I, 5 | each other because they are contraries.~But we must see how this
11 I, 5 | contrary or a product of contraries.~Up to this point we have
12 I, 5 | their principles, with the contraries, giving no reason indeed
13 I, 5 | another in that some assume contraries which are more primary,
14 I, 5 | are more primary, others contraries which are less so: some
15 I, 5 | have said, take as their contraries what is more knowable in
16 I, 5 | that our principles must be contraries.~
17 I, 6 | principles. Lastly, some contraries are more primary than others,
18 I, 6 | true of any other pair of contraries; for Love does not gather
19 I, 6 | We do not find that the contraries constitute the substance
20 I, 6 | as the substratum of the contraries, such as is spoken of by
21 I, 6 | already involved with pairs of contraries. There is, therefore, much
22 I, 6 | their One by means of the contraries, such as density and rarity
23 I, 6 | on; but if we have four contraries, there will be two contrarieties,
24 I, 7 | three; a sense in which the contraries are the principles-say for
25 I, 7 | it is impossible for the contraries to be acted on by each other.
26 I, 7 | substratum is different from the contraries, for it is itself not a
27 I, 7 | more in number than the contraries, but as it were two, nor
28 I, 7 | be a substratum for the contraries, and that the contraries
29 I, 7 | contraries, and that the contraries must be two. (Yet in another
30 I, 7 | necessary, as one of the contraries will serve to effect the
31 I, 7 | explained first that only the contraries were principles, and later
32 I, 7 | the difference between the contraries, the mutual relation of
33 I, 9 | contrary desire it, for contraries are mutually destructive.
34 III, 1 | said. (This is obvious in contraries. "To be capable of health"
35 III, 5 | be more than one, and the contraries must always balance, and
36 IV, 9 | there is a single matter for contraries, hot and cold and the other
37 IV, 9 | is not separable from the contraries but its being is different,
38 V, 1 | everything, but only in contraries, in things intermediate
39 V, 1 | in things intermediate contraries, and in contradictories,
40 V, 1 | contrary to either of two contraries: for the intermediate is
41 V, 1 | no opposition either of contraries or of contradictories.~Now
42 V, 2 | these we have a pair of contraries. Motion in respect of Quality
43 V, 2 | is used to include both contraries: and by Quality I do not
44 V, 2 | name that includes both contraries, but it is called increase
45 V, 2 | that in the former case the contraries will have to be contrary
46 V, 3 | opposites may be either contraries or contradictories; since
47 V, 3 | between" must imply a pair of contraries) That is locally contrary
48 V, 5 | motions respectively from contraries, e.g. a motion from health
49 V, 5 | motions respectively to contraries, e.g. a motion to health
50 V, 5 | motions respectively to contraries, and motions respectively
51 V, 5 | motions respectively to contraries from the opposite contraries.
52 V, 5 | contraries from the opposite contraries. Now it would seem that
53 V, 5 | would seem that motions to contraries are at the same time motions
54 V, 5 | the same time motions from contraries (though their essence may
55 V, 5 | locomotion, which too are contraries. On the other hand, a process
56 V, 5 | has no contrary we have as contraries change from and change to
57 V, 5 | And wherever a pair of contraries admit of an intermediate,
58 V, 5 | motions to one or other of the contraries: for the intermediate serves
59 V, 6 | rest. States of rest in contraries are opposed. To take an
60 V, 6 | all things that have no contraries there are opposite changes (
61 V, 6 | rest to its contrary, the contraries rest and motion will be
62 VI, 6 | that is to say, between contraries and between contradictories.
63 VI, 10| contradictories or between contraries, is a change from something
64 VI, 10| contrary changes the particular contraries are the limits, since these
65 VI, 10| always dependent upon some contraries. Similarly contraries are
66 VI, 10| some contraries. Similarly contraries are the extreme points of
67 VI, 10| it is not always between contraries. But since that which cannot
68 VIII, 2| change must be bounded by the contraries that mark its course, and
69 VIII, 7| changes to the respective contraries are contrary changes. Now
70 VIII, 7| for the changing thing the contraries will be states of rest.
71 VIII, 7| contradictory changes are contraries or not makes no difference,
72 VIII, 8| these being the pairs of contraries in the sphere of place.
73 VIII, 8| form or magnitude): and contraries are specifically not one
74 VIII, 8| arrest each other, because contraries annihilate or obstruct one
75 VIII, 8| successiveness: in fact, how could contraries, e.g. whiteness and blackness,
76 VIII, 8| that point are not always contraries or opposites: they are contraries
77 VIII, 8| contraries or opposites: they are contraries only if they are on the
|