Book, Paragraph
1 I, 3 | motionless? Why should it not move, the whole of it within
2 III, 1 | patient and generally what can move and what can be moved. For "
3 III, 2 | movable as such is just to move it. But this it does by
4 III, 2 | being contact with what can move so that the mover is also
5 IV, 1 | nor as end, nor does it move existents.~(5) Further,
6 IV, 8 | will a body placed in it move to? It certainly cannot
7 IV, 8 | to? It certainly cannot move into the whole of the void.
8 IV, 8 | will what is placed in it move, or rest? Much the same
9 IV, 8 | place to which things can move more or less than to another;
10 IV, 8 | fact things that are thrown move though that which gave them
11 IV, 8 | things are now thought to move into the void because it
12 IV, 8 | everywhere, so that things should move in all directions.~Further,
13 IV, 8 | somewhat dense. A, then, will move through B in time G, and
14 IV, 8 | incorporeal than water, A will move through D faster than through
15 IV, 8 | if A is to traverse and move through it in a certain
16 IV, 8 | a time in which it will move through any part of the
17 IV, 8 | alike in other respects, move faster over an equal space,
18 IV, 8 | Therefore they will also move through the void with this
19 IV, 8 | impossible; for why should one move faster? (In moving through
20 IV, 9 | thing is the quicker it will move upwards, if it were completely
21 IV, 9 | completely void it would move with a maximum speed! But
22 IV, 9 | impossible, that it should move at all; the same reason
23 IV, 9 | shows that the void cannot move, viz. the fact that the
24 IV, 13 | destroyed even if it does not move at all. And this is what,
25 IV, 14 | locomotion, if both things move along the circumference
26 V, 2 | and to things that do not move themselves locally.~Change
27 V, 2 | what we describe as hard to move; and in the third place
28 VII, 2 | Now it is impossible to move anything either from oneself
29 VII, 4 | the one must inevitably move more quickly or more slowly
30 VII, 5 | time the same force A will move 1/2B twice the distance
31 VII, 5 | distance G, and in 1/2D it will move 1/2B the whole distance
32 VII, 5 | Again if a given force move a given weight a certain
33 VII, 5 | half the motive power will move half the weight the same
34 VII, 5 | the same time. But if E move Z a distance G in a time
35 VII, 5 | necessarily follow that E can move twice Z half the distance
36 VII, 5 | the same time. If, then, A move B a distance G in a time
37 VII, 5 | otherwise one man might move a ship, since both the motive
38 VII, 5 | any length of time fail to move the air that the whole bushel
39 VII, 5 | fact it does not of itself move even such a quantity of
40 VII, 5 | quantity of the air as it would move if this part were by itself:
41 VII, 5 | forces in combination will move the combined weights an
42 VIII, 4 | locomotion. Moreover if things move themselves, it would be
43 VIII, 4 | naturally connected substance move itself? In so far as a thing
44 VIII, 4 | that we are now considering move themselves (for they are
45 VIII, 4 | cases the thing does not move itself, but it contains
46 VIII, 5 | whereas the last does not move the first, and the first
47 VIII, 5 | first, and the first will move the thing without the last,
48 VIII, 5 | last, but the last will not move it without the first: e.g.
49 VIII, 5 | e.g. the stick will not move anything unless it is itself
50 VIII, 5 | which a thing is moved to move it without being moved by
51 VIII, 5 | else that moves it, it must move itself. So this reasoning
52 VIII, 5 | motion, but it need not move anything else: the instrument
53 VIII, 5 | instrument of motion must both move something else and be itself
54 VIII, 5 | the case of things that move other things locally, in
55 VIII, 5 | in motion, it would not move anything-then the movent,
56 VIII, 5 | itself should in its entirety move itself: for then, while
57 VIII, 5 | Consequently (if a thing can move itself as a whole), the
58 VIII, 5 | each of the two parts is to move the other, there will be
59 VIII, 5 | whole, the part will still move itself, but the whole will
60 VIII, 5 | accidentally that the parts move themselves: and therefore,
61 VIII, 5 | if I take away G, AB will move itself, A imparting motion
62 VIII, 5 | moved, whereas G will not move itself or in fact be moved
63 VIII, 5 | at all. Nor again will BG move itself apart from A: for
64 VIII, 5 | but does not necessarily move anything else: and each
65 VIII, 5 | AB will still continue to move itself. Perhaps we may state
66 VIII, 6 | that causes things that move themselves at one time to
67 VIII, 6 | caused by any of those which move certain particular things,
68 VIII, 6 | particular things, while others move other things. The eternity
69 VIII, 6 | though many things that move themselves perish and are
70 VIII, 6 | therefore, that animals move themselves only with one
71 VIII, 6 | the system they awake and move themselves, the first principle
72 VIII, 6 | something that is in motion to move them: for the motion imparted
73 VIII, 9 | animals and all living things move themselves, the motion is
74 VIII, 10| exception of things that move themselves is moved by something
75 VIII, 10| original movent ceases to move them, even if, like the
76 VIII, 10| when its movent ceases to move it, but it still remains
|