Book, Paragraph
1 I, 3 | rather than what is not? For suppose that "substance" is also "
2 I, 3 | If, on the other hand, we suppose that "biped" and "animal"
3 I, 4 | of its components that we suppose we know a complex.~Further (
4 I, 6 | number, it is plausible to suppose them more than two. For
5 I, 6 | maintain the reverse.~To suppose then that the elements are
6 I, 6 | contrarieties, and we shall have to suppose an intermediate nature for
7 I, 8 | much farther astray as to suppose that nothing else comes
8 I, 8 | of a certain kind. Thus, suppose a dog to come to be from
9 II, 3 | more or less remote, e.g. suppose that "a pale man" or "a
10 II, 8 | other parts in which we suppose that there is purpose? Wherever
11 II, 8 | impediment.~It is absurd to suppose that purpose is not present
12 II, 9 | just as if one were to suppose that the wall of a house
13 III, 1 | has led some people to suppose that every mover is moved.
14 III, 3 | is contrary to reason to suppose that there should be one
15 III, 4 | infinite) leads people to suppose that body also is infinite,
16 III, 4 | contradictions result whether we suppose it to exist or not to exist.
17 III, 5 | be a definite quantity.~Suppose then that infinity belongs
18 III, 5 | one which the physicists suppose to exist alongside the elements:
19 III, 5 | for fire and for a spark.~Suppose (a) that the infinite sensible
20 III, 6 | But on the other hand to suppose that the infinite does not
21 III, 6 | man or a horse, but must suppose it to exist in the sense
22 III, 6 | absurd and impossible to suppose that the unknowable and
23 III, 7 | contains. It is natural too to suppose that in number there is
24 IV, 1 | what it is-both because all suppose that things which exist
25 IV, 1 | considerations then would lead us to suppose that place is something
26 IV, 1 | annihilated.~True, but even if we suppose its existence settled, the
27 IV, 1 | the world then are we to suppose place to be? If it has the
28 IV, 4 | for this reason that we suppose the heaven also to be in
29 IV, 5 | if at least, as we must suppose, no body contains it. On
30 IV, 7 | Every body, again, they suppose to be tangible; and of this
31 IV, 7 | syllogism. It would be absurd to suppose that the point is void;
32 IV, 10 | these. One would naturally suppose that what is made up of
33 IV, 11 | place in the mind we at once suppose that some time also has
34 V, 4 | only specifically one).~Suppose, however, that Socrates
35 V, 6 | for it would be absurd to suppose that there are contrary
36 VI, 2 | given of "the quicker". Suppose that A is quicker than B.
37 VI, 2 | less time than the slower, suppose that A is quicker and B
38 VI, 2 | finite magnitude, and let us suppose that it is traversed in
39 VI, 2 | another in this proportion. Suppose, then, that the quicker
40 VI, 2 | passed over in an equal time. Suppose then that it is thus divided
41 VI, 3 | slower motion in the present. Suppose then that in the present
42 VI, 4 | accidentally divisible). For suppose that A is the time occupied
43 VI, 5 | is equally impossible to suppose that one part of AG contains
44 VI, 5 | which the change began. For suppose that AD is such a primary
45 VI, 5 | preceding time GA (for we may suppose that it is at rest), it
46 VI, 5 | part that has changed. For suppose that of AE the primary part
47 VI, 5 | let AB be a magnitude, and suppose that it has moved from B
48 VI, 6 | in a period of time. For suppose that a thing has changed
49 VI, 6 | changes is continuous. For suppose that a thing has changed
50 VI, 7 | not uniform. For let us suppose that the line AB represents
51 VI, 10 | in motion of itself. For suppose that it is changing from
52 VII, 1 | first movent. For let us suppose that this is not so and
53 VII, 3 | would be most natural to suppose that there is alteration
54 VII, 3 | for it would be absurd to suppose that the coping or the tiling
55 VII, 4 | line? It would be absurd to suppose that the motion of one in
56 VII, 4 | equal amount of motion. Suppose, then, that in a certain
57 VIII, 1 | their round":~ ~for we must suppose that he means by this that
58 VIII, 1 | motion had its becoming. To suppose, on the other hand, that
59 VIII, 1 | is a wrong assumption to suppose universally that we have
60 VIII, 4 | would be unreasonable to suppose that in only one kind of
61 VIII, 5 | not to say necessary, to suppose the existence of the third
62 VIII, 6 | accidental sense. Let us suppose, if any one likes, that
63 VIII, 6 | be). And let us further suppose it possible that some principles
64 VIII, 6 | movents. We ought, however, to suppose that there is one rather
65 VIII, 8 | arises, which is as follows. Suppose the line E is equal to the
66 VIII, 8 | course we must do so. For suppose H in the course of its locomotion
67 VIII, 8 | nature it is inadequate. For suppose the distance to be left
68 VIII, 8 | number of distances, and suppose that the inquiry is made
69 VIII, 8 | what happens to it. Let us suppose a time ABG and a thing D,
70 VIII, 8 | divisible into time-atoms. For suppose that D was becoming white
71 VIII, 8 | of motion. Now we are to suppose that a thing proceeds in
72 VIII, 8 | point at issue. We will suppose that there has occurred
73 VIII, 10| infinite time. Now let us suppose that D moves E, a part of
74 VIII, 10| action could take place. Suppose that A is the time occupied
|