Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2  |         though Nature is not their subject: so it will perhaps be as
 2   I, 2  |         predicated of substance as subject. Now Melissus says that
 3   I, 3  |    attribute is predicated of some subject, so that the subject to
 4   I, 3  |          some subject, so that the subject to which "being" is attributed
 5   I, 3  |          of anything else. For the subject cannot be a being, unless "
 6   I, 3  |           man or of (b) some other subject. But neither is possible.~(
 7   I, 3  |           or may not belong to the subject or that in whose definition
 8   I, 3  |            in whose definition the subject of which it is an attribute
 9   I, 3  |    attribute of anything, that the subject of which both "biped" and "
10   I, 3  |   separately are predicated is the subject also of the complex "biped
11   I, 4  |         was not the predicate of a subject. So his "Mind" is an absurd
12   I, 5  |           the other writers on the subject with us, as I have said
13   I, 6  |            be the predicate of any subject. If it were, there would
14   I, 6  |        supposed principle: for the subject is a principle, and prior
15   I, 7  |        simply or combined with the subject.~These distinctions drawn,
16   I, 7  |            that there must be some subject, namely, that which becomes.
17   I, 7  |        relation, time, or place, a subject is always presupposed, since
18   I, 7  |          not predicated of another subject, but everything else of
19   I, 7  |          in two senses, either the subject or the opposite. By the "
20   I, 7  |           the "unmusical", by the "subject" "man", and similarly I
21   I, 7  |       bronze or stone or gold the "subject".~Plainly then, if there
22   I, 7  |   everything comes to be from both subject and form. For "musical man"
23   I, 7  |            these elements.~Now the subject is one numerically, though
24   I, 7  |          natural objects which are subject to generation, and how the
25  II, 1  |           a substance; for it is a subject, and nature always implies
26  II, 1  |            nature always implies a subject in which it inheres.~The
27 III, 1  |         and change", and it is the subject of our inquiry. We must
28 III, 1  |            and being well. Yet the subject both of health and of sickness-whether
29 III, 2  |            is rest-when a thing is subject to motion its immobility
30 III, 3  |      alterations of quality in one subject towards one definite quality?
31 III, 3  |           is not cut adrift from a subject, but is of A on B.~(2) There
32 III, 3  |            they belong to the same subject, the motion; for the "actualization
33 III, 5  |            and not predicated of a subject. Hence it will be either
34 III, 7  |          essence is privation, the subject as such being what is continuous
35  IV, 11 | self-identical; for the "now" as a subject is an identity, but it accepts
36  IV, 12 |         things therefore which are subject to perishing and becoming-generally,
37   V, 1  |          in one of four ways: from subject to subject, from subject
38   V, 1  |         four ways: from subject to subject, from subject to nonsubject,
39   V, 1  |           subject to subject, from subject to nonsubject, from non-subject
40   V, 1  |    nonsubject, from non-subject to subject, or from non-subject to
41   V, 1  |          to non-subject, where by "subject" I mean what is affirmatively
42   V, 1  |         kinds of change, that from subject to subject, that from subject
43   V, 1  |       change, that from subject to subject, that from subject to non-subject,
44   V, 1  |      subject to subject, that from subject to non-subject, and that
45   V, 1  |           that from non-subject to subject: for the fourth conceivable
46   V, 1  |         change from non-subject to subject, the relation being that
47   V, 1  |      particular thing. Change from subject to non-subject is "perishing"-"unqualified perishing"
48   V, 1  |      follows that only change from subject to subject is motion. And
49   V, 1  |        only change from subject to subject is motion. And every such
50   V, 1  |          is motion. And every such subject is either a contrary or
51   V, 2  |       motion might be conceived as subject; e.g. a man is in motion
52   V, 2  |    Impossible: for change is not a subject. Or (2) can there be motion
53   V, 2  |          the sense that some other subject changes from a change to
54   V, 2  |           sense. For, whatever the subject may be, movement is change
55   V, 2  |        forgetting only because the subject of this change changes at
56   V, 4  |            makes the motion one in subject, and it is the time that
57   V, 5  |           change from a particular subject to a particular subject),
58   V, 5  |            subject to a particular subject), it follows that contrary
59   V, 6  |       Should there be a particular subject, absence of change in its
60  VI, 5  |             however, to the actual subject of change-that is to say
61  VI, 5  |            changes, and the actual subject of change, e.g. the man,
62 VII, 3  |            excellence is naturally subject to alteration: thus excellence
63 VII, 4  |      specifically different if the subject is different while the attribute
64 VII, 4  |           appears different in one subject from what appears in another?
65 VII, 4  |            commensurability in the subject of the affection or in the
66 VIII, 7 |            is no necessity for the subject of locomotion to be the
67 VIII, 7 |            of locomotion to be the subject either of increase or of
68 VIII, 9 |         primary substances are not subject to any of the other motions,
69 VIII, 9 |            these substances are so subject: the processes of increase
70 VIII, 10|         motion, it will have to be subject to the same conditions as
71 VIII, 10|          since the movent is never subject to any change. So, too,
72 VIII, 10|   character, the moved must not be subject to change in respect of