Book, Paragraph
1 I, 2 | 2~The principles in question must be either (a) one or (
2 I, 2 | his science-this being a question for a different science
3 I, 2 | interest.~The most pertinent question with which to begin will
4 I, 4 | quality. But the principles in question are infinite both in multitude
5 I, 6 | 6~The next question is whether the principles
6 I, 6 | or three is, as I said, a question of considerable difficulty.~
7 I, 7 | account, approaching the question first with reference to
8 I, 7 | clear.~So much then for the question of the number and the nature
9 I, 9 | apprehended the nature in question, but not adequately.~In
10 II, 4 | spontaneity are.~Some people even question whether they are real or
11 II, 4 | strange indeed, and the question might be raised, why on
12 II, 5 | cases one might raise the question whether any incidental fact
13 II, 7 | things comprehended under the question "why". The "why" is referred
14 II, 7 | destructible things.~The question "why", then, is answered
15 III, 1 | mover is moved. But this question depends on another set of
16 III, 5 | involves the more general question whether the infinite can
17 III, 5 | hand, we investigate the question more in accordance with
18 III, 5 | composed. Hence the body in question would have been present
19 III, 5 | generally, and apart from the question of how any of them could
20 IV, 1 | we call "locomotion".~The question, what is place? presents
21 IV, 1 | its existence settled, the question of its nature presents difficulty-whether
22 IV, 2 | If, then, we look at the question in this way the place of
23 IV, 3 | place.~One might raise the question whether a thing can be in
24 IV, 3 | or in something else.~The question is ambiguous; we may mean
25 IV, 4 | place? The answer to this question may be elucidated as follows.~
26 IV, 7 | touch. So we would raise the question: what would they say of
27 IV, 9 | hot; so, too, it is all a question of contraction and expansion
28 IV, 14 | another into the condition in question, when it moves over the
29 IV, 14 | would exist or not, is a question that may fairly be asked;
30 IV, 14 | One might also raise the question what sort of movement time
31 V, 1 | to part of the thing in question: thus the body is restored
32 V, 6 | qualification: there remains the question, is the opposite of remaining
33 V, 6 | unnatural.~Here, however, the question arises, has every state
34 V, 6 | coming to a standstill the question may be raised whether there
35 VI, 4 | change from white the goal in question will be grey, not black:
36 VI, 5 | possessing the characteristics in question of itself and not in virtue
37 VI, 6 | some part of the thing in question, e.g. the foundation-stone
38 VII, 1 | We have dealt with this question above. Now let us further
39 VII, 1 | whether the magnitude in question is finite or infinite this
40 VII, 2 | where animate things are in question, we make them both of the
41 VII, 3 | and that the activity in question is similar to these.) And
42 VII, 4 | only must the attribute in question be applicable to both without
43 VII, 4 | where alteration is in question, how is one alteration to
44 VII, 4 | there still remains the question whether, supposing that
45 VII, 4 | we must consider the same question in the case of becoming
46 VIII, 1 | to consider the following question. Was there ever a becoming
47 VIII, 1 | the world and study the question of becoming and perishing,
48 VIII, 1 | that before the motion in question another change or motion
49 VIII, 1 | themselves causes of the fact in question, nor is it of the essence
50 VIII, 2 | whole or some part is in question) not in motion but at rest,
51 VIII, 2 | I mean that e.g. we may question whether the note given by
52 VIII, 3 | weakness: it would call in question a whole system, not a particular
53 VIII, 3 | extravagant calling into question of the obvious: for alteration
54 VIII, 3 | But to investigate this question at all-to seek a reasoned
55 VIII, 4 | be it noted, this is the question we are trying to answer-how
56 VIII, 5 | attribute of the movents in question, so that each of them moves
57 VIII, 5 | fresh start and consider the question; if a thing moves itself,
58 VIII, 6 | must be unmoved. Now the question whether each of the things
59 VIII, 7 | opposite processes. The question whether these contradictory
60 VIII, 8 | in the straight line in question any one of the points lying
61 VIII, 8 | when we first discussed the question of motion we put forward
62 VIII, 8 | reply to the questioner (the question asked being whether it is
63 VIII, 8 | left out of account and the question asked to be no longer whether
64 VIII, 8 | halves. Therefore to the question whether it is possible to
65 VIII, 8 | issue. If we look at the question from the point of view of
66 VIII, 8 | plain that the motion in question is not continuous.~Our next
67 VIII, 10| by the same movent, the question is, what moves it?~Resuming
|