Book, Paragraph
1 II, 3| causes change of what is changed.~Again (4) in the sense
2 IV, 4| this place has now in turn changed to what is larger or smaller.~
3 IV, 4| or "science". These have changed their place only because
4 IV, 4| and separate may often be changed while the container remains
5 V, 2| sick, it must also have changed to whatever may be the other
6 VI, 2| time ZH, in which A has changed from G to D, B will not
7 VI, 5| something, that which has changed must at the moment when
8 VI, 5| moment when it has first changed be in that to which it has
9 VI, 5| in that to which it has changed. For that which changes
10 VI, 5| a consequence of having changed: for there is a like relation
11 VI, 5| contradiction, where a thing has changed from not-being to being
12 VI, 5| contradictory change that which has changed must be in that to which
13 VI, 5| in that to which it has changed. And if this is true in
14 VI, 5| that that that which has changed must be somewhere or in
15 VI, 5| left that from which it has changed and must be somewhere, it
16 VI, 5| in that to which it has changed or in something else. If,
17 VI, 5| If, then, that which has changed to B is in something other
18 VI, 5| that the thing that has changed, at the moment when it has
19 VI, 5| at the moment when it has changed, is changing to that to
20 VI, 5| to that to which it has changed, which is impossible: that
21 VI, 5| impossible: that which has changed, therefore, must be in that
22 VI, 5| in that to which it has changed. So it is evident likewise
23 VI, 5| then, that that which has changed, at the moment when it has
24 VI, 5| moment when it has first changed, is in that to which it
25 VI, 5| in that to which it has changed.~We will now show that the "
26 VI, 5| in which that which has changed effected the completion
27 VI, 5| for it must either have changed or be changing in each of
28 VI, 5| when in which something has changed". On the one hand it may
29 VI, 5| is correct to say "it has changed": on the other hand it may
30 VI, 5| simultaneously be at rest and have changed: for it is at rest in A
31 VI, 5| is at rest in A and has changed in D. Since then AD is not
32 VI, 5| changing thing must have changed in every part of it (for
33 VI, 5| part of it (for if it has changed in neither of the two parts
34 VI, 5| AD is divided, it has not changed in the whole either: if,
35 VI, 5| whole: and if, again, it has changed in one of the two parts,
36 VI, 5| primary when in which it has changed: it must therefore have
37 VI, 5| it must therefore have changed in every part). It is evident,
38 VI, 5| too, of that which has changed there is no primary part
39 VI, 5| no primary part that has changed. For suppose that of AE
40 VI, 5| the primary part that has changed is AZ (everything that changes
41 VI, 5| the time in which DZ has changed. If, then, in the whole
42 VI, 5| in the whole time DZ has changed, in half the time there
43 VI, 5| will be a part that has changed, less than and therefore
44 VI, 5| any primary part that has changed. It is evident, then, from
45 VI, 5| which the magnitude has changed, and something else again
46 VI, 5| where" to which a thing has changed. And if we take the case
47 VI, 6| either be changing or have changed in any part of the time
48 VI, 6| follows that it must have changed at every moment in the time:
49 VI, 6| that which is changing have changed, but that which has changed
50 VI, 6| changed, but that which has changed must also previously have
51 VI, 6| since everything that has changed from something to something
52 VI, 6| something to something has changed in a period of time. For
53 VI, 6| suppose that a thing has changed from A to B in a moment.
54 VI, 6| the moment in which it has changed cannot be the same as that
55 VI, 6| that that that which has changed, when it has changed, is
56 VI, 6| has changed, when it has changed, is not in that from which
57 VI, 6| in that from which it has changed. If, on the other hand,
58 VI, 6| consecutive. Since, then, it has changed in a period of time, and
59 VI, 6| consequently when it has changed, it must have previously
60 VI, 6| suppose that a thing has changed from G to D. Then if GD
61 VI, 6| segments. Everything that has changed, therefore, must previously
62 VI, 6| time in which a thing has changed and again apply the same
63 VI, 6| reasoning. So that which has changed must have been changing
64 VI, 6| which is changing must have changed, and a process of change
|