Book, Paragraph
1 I, 2 | continuous is one or that (b) the indivisible is one, or (c) things are
2 I, 2 | b) their One is one as indivisible, nothing will have quantity
3 I, 2 | for though the limit is indivisible, the limited is not.~But
4 I, 3 | that the All is composed of indivisible substances? Some thinkers
5 III, 5 | an attribute, it will be indivisible; for the divisible must
6 III, 5 | or an aggregate. But if indivisible, then not infinite, except
7 III, 5 | Hence it will be either indivisible or divisible into infinites.
8 III, 5 | must be without parts and indivisible. But this cannot be true
9 III, 6 | in refuting the theory of indivisible lines.) The alternative
10 III, 7 | reason is that what is one is indivisible whatever it may be, e.g.
11 III, 7 | number must stop at the indivisible: for "two" and "three" are
12 IV, 11 | soul seems to stay in one indivisible state, and when we perceive
13 IV, 13 | future time which is near the indivisible present "now" ("When do
14 VI, 1 | continuous and the point indivisible. For the extremities of
15 VI, 1 | neither be one (since of an indivisible there can be no extremity
16 VI, 1 | clear that it must be either indivisible or divisible, and if it
17 VI, 1 | indivisibles, we should have an indivisible in contact with an indivisible,
18 VI, 1 | indivisible in contact with an indivisible, since the extremities of
19 VI, 1 | composed of corresponding indivisible motions: e.g. if the magnitude
20 VI, 1 | motion DEZ of O over ABG is indivisible. Therefore, since where
21 VI, 1 | length and motion are thus indivisible, it is neither more nor
22 VI, 1 | that time also be similarly indivisible, that is to say be composed
23 VI, 1 | is to say be composed of indivisible moments: for if the whole
24 VI, 2 | continuous to be composed of indivisible parts, and every magnitude
25 VI, 2 | anything continuous can be indivisible.~This conclusion follows
26 VI, 2 | the divisibility of the indivisible. For since the distinction
27 VI, 2 | divided into two. Thus the indivisible will be divisible, and that
28 VI, 2 | be passed over not in an indivisible but in a greater time. It
29 VI, 3 | evident also that it is indivisible.~Now the present that is
30 VI, 3 | that the present is also indivisible: for if it is divisible
31 VI, 3 | time contains something indivisible, and this is what we call
32 VI, 3 | whereas we found it to be indivisible. It is impossible, therefore,
33 VI, 5 | completion of its change must be indivisible, where by "primary" I mean
34 VI, 5 | has been effected must be indivisible. It is also evident, therefore,
35 VI, 5 | to be has come to be are indivisible.~But there are two senses
36 VI, 5 | have in fact shown to be indivisible because it is a limit. But
37 VI, 5 | when. Then it cannot be indivisible: for, if it were, the moment
38 VI, 5 | Then if BG is taken to be indivisible, two things without parts
39 VI, 5 | be anything essentially indivisible.~
40 VI, 6 | from G to D. Then if GD is indivisible, two things without parts
41 VI, 8 | of time and not something indivisible, and since all time is infinitely
42 VI, 8 | motion in that which is indivisible, and that in which rest
43 VI, 9 | time is not composed of indivisible moments any more than any
44 VI, 10 | which is quantitatively indivisible (and that the case of the
45 VI, 10 | a point or of any other indivisible. That which is in motion
46 VI, 10 | itself. But since it is indivisible, there can be no space less
47 VI, 10 | likewise impossible for the indivisible to be in motion.~Again,
48 VI, 10 | less distance, and thus the indivisible will be divisible into something
49 VI, 10 | which is without parts and indivisible could be in motion would
50 VIII, 5 | being specifically one and indivisible, it would as a Whole both
51 VIII, 10| that the first movent is indivisible and is without parts and
|