Book, Paragraph
1 III, 1 | there is no common name), increase and decrease: of what can
2 III, 5 | infinite in the direction of increase.~We may begin with a dialectical
3 III, 6 | given magnitude. But if we increase the ratio of the part, so
4 III, 6 | in the direction both of increase and of reduction. Yet though
5 III, 6 | infinite in the direction of increase, for the parts number only
6 III, 7 | infinite in the direction of increase. For the size which it can
7 III, 7 | infinite in the direction of increase, in the sense of the untraversable.
8 IV, 4 | hand and, on the other, increase and diminution. For these
9 IV, 5 | locomotion or by way of increase is per se somewhere, but
10 IV, 6 | place (i.e. locomotion and increase) would not be. For it is
11 IV, 6 | present in it.~Again (3) increase, too, is thought to take
12 IV, 7 | squeezed out); and things can increase in size not only by the
13 IV, 7 | both the argument about increase of size and that about water
14 IV, 14| Now neither alteration nor increase nor coming into being can
15 V, 2 | contraries, but it is called increase or decrease according as
16 V, 2 | of complete magnitude is increase, motion in the contrary
17 V, 4 | the same with regard to increase and decrease. The difference
18 V, 6 | blackening; so, too, with increase and decrease: these are
19 V, 6 | is unnatural, nor is one increase contrary to another in this
20 V, 6 | standstill seems always to increase, the velocity of that which
21 VI, 10| extreme points of processes of increase and decrease: the limit
22 VI, 10| and decrease: the limit of increase is to be found in the complete
23 VI, 10| and that by a process of increase and that again by a process
24 VII, 2 | alteration, and that which causes increase or decrease.~Let us begin
25 VII, 2 | suffers and that which causes increase: for the part of the latter
26 VII, 2 | the latter that starts the increase does so by becoming attached
27 VII, 2 | detached. So that which causes increase and that which causes decrease
28 VII, 2 | with that which suffers increase and that which suffers decrease
29 VII, 5 | good of alteration and of increase also? Surely it does, for
30 VII, 5 | definite thing that cause increase and a definite thing that
31 VII, 5 | definite thing that suffers increase, and the one causes and
32 VII, 5 | suffers a certain amount of increase in a certain amount of time.
33 VII, 5 | which causes alteration or increase causes a certain amount
34 VII, 5 | causes a certain amount of increase or alteration respectively
35 VII, 5 | the time the alteration or increase will be completed by it:
36 VII, 5 | will be no alteration or increase at all, the case being the
37 VIII, 3| continuous process either of increase or of decrease: that which
38 VIII, 3| can be no such thing as increase: nor can there be any such
39 VIII, 5| locomotion in process of, say, increase. But it is evident that
40 VIII, 5| locomotion is in process of increase, that which is causing this
41 VIII, 5| that which is causing this increase is in process of being altered
42 VIII, 5| capacity, let us say, for increase. It is not necessary, therefore,
43 VIII, 6| own instrumentality, e.g. increase, decrease, and respiration:
44 VIII, 7| impossible that there should be increase without the previous occurrence
45 VIII, 7| be the subject either of increase or of alteration, nor need
46 VIII, 7| experiences alteration and increase, and locomotion is a motion
47 VIII, 7| motions next in order I mean increase and then alteration, decrease,
48 VIII, 7| contrary affections, and for increase and decrease either greatness
49 VIII, 8| consequently neither alteration nor increase admits of continuity. We
50 VIII, 9| subject: the processes of increase and decrease and alteration,
51 VIII, 9| a thing is in process of increase or decrease or is undergoing
|