Book, Paragraph
1 IV, 11| we have not noticed its changing, we do not realize that
2 V, 2 | of motion, that which is changing from health to sickness
3 V, 2 | sickness must simultaneously be changing from this very change to
4 V, 2 | processes of becoming and changing. What can this be in the
5 V, 3 | are together.~That which a changing thing, if it changes continuously
6 V, 5 | is not the same, just as changing from health is different
7 V, 5 | health is different from changing to disease.) Nor are motion
8 V, 5 | shall speak later), but changing to a contrary rather than
9 V, 5 | to a contrary rather than changing from a contrary would seem
10 V, 6 | the goal to which it is changing: and consequently a motion
11 VI, 4 | its change it is no longer changing, and when both it itself
12 VI, 4 | of its change it is not changing (for that which is in whole
13 VI, 4 | that part of that which is changing must be at the starting-point
14 VI, 4 | that that that which is changing should be at either of the
15 VI, 5 | leaving, if not identical with changing, is at any rate a consequence
16 VI, 5 | leaving is a consequence of changing, having left is a consequence
17 VI, 5 | say G, it must again be changing from G to B: for it cannot
18 VI, 5 | when it has changed, is changing to that to which it has
19 VI, 5 | other hand, it has been changing in both AB and BG (for it
20 VI, 5 | either have changed or be changing in each of them), it must
21 VI, 5 | them), it must have been changing in the whole AG: but our
22 VI, 5 | consecutive). Again, if the changing thing is at rest in the
23 VI, 5 | must be divisible, and the changing thing must have changed
24 VI, 6 | that which changes must be changing in any part of the primary
25 VI, 6 | time, everything that is changing must have completed an infinite
26 VI, 6 | its change must either be changing or have changed in any part
27 VI, 6 | and since it cannot be changing in a moment, it follows
28 VI, 6 | number, everything that is changing must have completed an infinite
29 VI, 6 | only must that which is changing have changed, but that which
30 VI, 6 | also previously have been changing, since everything that has
31 VI, 6 | must have previously been changing.~Moreover, the truth of
32 VI, 6 | magnitude over which what is changing changes is continuous. For
33 VI, 6 | must previously have been changing: for the same proof also
34 VI, 6 | has changed must have been changing and that which is changing
35 VI, 6 | changing and that which is changing must have changed, and a
36 VI, 6 | space or time which the changing thing may occupy.~
37 VI, 8 | impossible for that which is changing to be as a whole, at the
38 VI, 8 | time when it is primarily changing, over against any particular
39 VI, 9 | argument that if a thing is changing from not-white, say, to
40 VI, 9 | contradictory relation: while the changing thing must of necessity
41 VI, 9 | the whole also is always changing to a different position:
42 VI, 9 | Thus one orbit is always changing into another, and the thing
43 VI, 10| For suppose that it is changing from AB to BG-either from
44 VI, 10| the time in which it is changing it must be either in AB
45 VI, 10| true of everything that is changing. Now it cannot be partly
46 VI, 10| the time in which it is changing, it is in AB. That being
47 VI, 10| should be in process of changing to that to which it cannot
48 VI, 10| locomotion is in process of changing, it must be capable of completing
49 VIII, 6| itself being in motion and changing as it comes into relation
50 VIII, 6| movent that is in motion and changing, so that they too must change.
51 VIII, 7| clear, then, that for the changing thing the contraries will
|