Book, Paragraph
1 IV, 8 | B in time G, and through D, which is thinner, in time
2 IV, 8 | length of B is egual to D), in proportion to the density
3 IV, 8 | For let B be water and D air; then by so much as
4 IV, 8 | water, A will move through D faster than through B. Let
5 IV, 8 | twice the time that it does D, and the time G will be
6 IV, 8 | in magnitude to B and to D. Then if A is to traverse
7 IV, 8 | be as much thinner than D as E exceeds H, A, if it
8 V, 1 | distinct from these three) (d) that from which and (e)
9 VI, 1 | traversed A when its motion was D, B when its motion was E,
10 VI, 1 | the presence of the motion D. Consequently, if O actually
11 VI, 1 | its motion is the three D, E, and Z, and if it is
12 VI, 2 | A has changed from G to D, B will not yet have arrived
13 VI, 2 | not yet have arrived at D but will be short of it:
14 VI, 2 | in which A has arrived at D, B being the slower has
15 VI, 2 | whole time ZH in arriving at D, will have arrived at O
16 VI, 2 | has passed over the whole D in the time ZO, the slower
17 VI, 5 | in A and has changed in D. Since then AD is not without
18 VI, 6 | thing has changed from G to D. Then if GD is indivisible,
19 VI, 10 | its contradictory-and let D be the primary time in which
20 VII, 1 | moved by B, B by G, G by D, and so on, each member
21 VII, 1 | respectively the motions of G and D: for though they are all
22 VII, 1 | possible. If, then, A, B, G, D form an infinite magnitude
23 VII, 5 | B a distance G in a time D, then in the same time the
24 VII, 5 | Z a distance G in a time D, it does not necessarily
25 VII, 5 | B a distance G in a time D, it does not follow that
26 VII, 5 | half of A, will in the time D or in any fraction of it
27 VIII, 8 | when A is at the point B, D is proceeding in uniform
28 VIII, 8 | then, says the argument, D will have reached H before
29 VIII, 8 | that at the same moment D was in motion from the extremity
30 VIII, 8 | its locomotion proceeds to D and then turns back and
31 VIII, 8 | then the extreme point D has served as finishing-point
32 VIII, 8 | cannot have come to be at D and departed from D simultaneously,
33 VIII, 8 | be at D and departed from D simultaneously, for in that
34 VIII, 8 | cannot argue that H is at D at a sectional point of
35 VIII, 8 | suppose a time ABG and a thing D, D being white in the time
36 VIII, 8 | time ABG and a thing D, D being white in the time
37 VIII, 8 | not-white in the time B. Then D is at the moment G white
38 VIII, 8 | time-atoms. For suppose that D was becoming white in the
39 VIII, 8 | with the last atom of A, D has already become white
40 VIII, 8 | argument: according to them D has become and so is white
41 VIII, 8 | Moreover it is clear that if D was becoming white in the
42 VIII, 10| Now let us suppose that D moves E, a part of B. Then
43 VIII, 10| by continuing to add to D, I shall use up A and by
44 VIII, 10| say the time Z in moving D. Now if I take a magnitude
45 VIII, 10| this magnitude in moving D will be half of EZ (assuming
|