Book, Paragraph
1 I, 1 | present inquiry we must follow this method and advance
2 I, 2 | their conclusions do not follow. Or rather the argument
3 I, 3 | their conclusions do not follow. Or rather the argument
4 I, 3 | suddenly. Again, does it follow that Being, if one, is motionless?
5 I, 3 | true" and "that does not follow". His assumption that one
6 I, 3 | His conclusion does not follow, because if we take only
7 I, 4 | body, it seems obviously to follow that everything cannot subsist
8 I, 5 | are not simple but complex follow the same principle, but
9 I, 9 | in the expositions which follow.~The above, then, may be
10 II, 6 | bowels; if this does not follow after walking, we say that
11 III, 8 | infinitum. But it does not follow that he is bigger than the
12 IV, 6 | were possible, it would follow also that the smallest body
13 IV, 8 | this impossible result will follow: it will be found to traverse
14 IV, 12| in time. For it does not follow that what is in time is
15 VI, 9 | the conclusion will not follow.~The fourth argument is
16 VI, 9 | Then three consequences follow:~First, as the B’s and the
17 VII, 2 | when the movent does not follow up the thing that it has
18 VII, 5 | it does not necessarily follow that E can move twice Z
19 VII, 5 | in a time D, it does not follow that E, being half of A,
20 VII, 5 | at all; for it does not follow that, if a given motive
21 VII, 5 | it does not necessarily follow that half the force will
22 VIII, 3| by the drop, it does not follow that half the amount has
23 VIII, 3| number of parts it does not follow that some part must always
24 VIII, 3| infinitely divisible it does not follow from this that the same
25 VIII, 3| has fallen ill, there must follow a period of time in which
26 VIII, 3| not appear to be so if we follow sense-perception: many things
27 VIII, 8| since the two motions that follow the same straight line are
28 VIII, 8| as the two motions that follow the same straight line are
|