Book, Paragraph
1 I, 6 | subject is a principle, and prior presumably to what is predicated
2 I, 6 | how can non-substances be prior to substance?~If then we
3 I, 6 | principles can differ only as prior and posterior, not in genus;
4 II, 3 | the same kind one may be prior to another (e.g. the doctor
5 II, 3 | This last cause then is prior: and so generally.~Further,
6 II, 6 | nothing which is incidental is prior to what is per se, it is
7 II, 6 | incidental cause can be prior to a cause per se. Spontaneity
8 II, 6 | intelligence and nature will be prior causes of this All and of
9 IV, 10| with one another, but the prior "now" must always have ceased-to-be.
10 IV, 10| have ceased-to-be. But the prior "now" cannot have ceased-to-be
11 IV, 10| time (i.e. being neither prior nor posterior) means to
12 V, 3 | is a property of things prior in definition, e.g. numbers,
13 VI, 5 | we shall have something prior to what is primary. So that
14 VI, 5 | less than and therefore prior to DZ: and again there will
15 VI, 5 | there will be another part prior to this, and yet another,
16 VI, 5 | there will be something prior to G to which the magnitude
17 VI, 5 | and something else again prior to that, and so on to infinity,
18 VIII, 5| independently a cause is always prior as a cause to that which
19 VIII, 7| senses. A thing is said to be prior to other things when, if
20 VIII, 7| motions next in order can be prior to locomotion. By the motions
21 VIII, 7| if not even becoming is prior to locomotion, then no one
22 VIII, 7| the order of becoming is prior in the order of nature.
23 VIII, 7| then this motion must be prior to all others in respect
24 VIII, 9| and the two former must be prior to the last, since they
25 VIII, 9| Moreover rotatory locomotion is prior to rectilinear locomotion,
26 VIII, 9| time alike the complete is prior to the incomplete and the
27 VIII, 9| admits of being eternal is prior to one that does not. Now
|