Book, Paragraph
1 I, 3 | follows that "white" is not-being—and that not in the sense
2 I, 3 | the sense of a particular not-being, but in the sense that it
3 I, 3 | which we found to mean not-being. If to avoid this we say
4 I, 3 | thing, they conceded that not-being is; to that from bisection,
5 I, 3 | should not be a particular not-being. To say that all things
6 I, 4 | nothing comes into being from not-being. For this is the reason
7 I, 5 | one as being, the other as not-being. Again he speaks of differences
8 I, 8 | come to be so-and-so from not-being" means "qua not-being".~
9 I, 8 | from not-being" means "qua not-being".~It was through failure
10 I, 8 | which in its own nature is not-being,-this not surviving as a
11 I, 8 | not from being-nor from not-being either, for it has been
12 I, 8 | not being" we mean from not-being qua not-being.~Note further
13 I, 8 | mean from not-being qua not-being.~Note further that we do
14 I, 9 | these, namely the matter, is not-being only in virtue of an attribute
15 I, 9 | privation in its own nature is not-being; and that the matter is
16 V, 1 | perishing" is change to not-being, though it is also true
17 V, 1 | though it is also change from not-being.~Now a definition of motion
18 V, 1 | change from unqualified not-being to being is coming to be
19 V, 1 | change is from being to not-being, "particular perishing"
20 V, 1 | be.~Now the expression "not-being" is used in several senses:
21 V, 6 | absence of change in its not-being. And here a difficulty may
22 V, 6 | difficulty may be raised: if not-being is not a particular something,
23 V, 6 | of change in the thing’s not-being, or the ceasing to be of
24 VI, 5 | a thing has changed from not-being to being it has left not-being.
25 VI, 5 | not-being to being it has left not-being. Therefore it will be in
26 VI, 9 | in the case of being and not-being and all other conditions
27 VI, 10| limit of coming to be and not-being is the limit of ceasing
|