Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 8 |      things can be explained in terms of potentiality and actuality.
 2  II, 1 |          and the meaning of the terms "by nature" and "according
 3  II, 2 |    matter nor can be defined in terms of matter only. Here too
 4  II, 5 |      evil" when it is evil. The terms "good fortune" and "ill
 5  II, 8 |        the later to the earlier terms of the series is the same
 6 III, 1 |      attack in the same way the terms which are involved in it.
 7 III, 7 |    three" are merely derivative terms, and so with each of the
 8 III, 7 |      the movement. (I use these terms for the moment. Later I
 9  IV, 3 |         a thing is described in terms of its parts, as well as
10  IV, 3 |        its parts, as well as in terms of the thing as a whole,
11  IV, 6 | separates and distinguishes the terms of a series. This holds
12   V, 3 |       now proceed to define the terms "together" and "apart", "
13   V, 3 |     circumstances each of these terms is naturally applicable.~
14   V, 3 |        is obvious that of these terms "in succession" is first
15   V, 3 |     circumstances each of these terms is applicable.~
16  VI, 1 |                    1~Now if the terms "continuous", "in contact",
17  VI, 4 |     cases the fact that all the terms are divisible or infinite
18  VI, 8 |       of time.~Again, since the terms "quicker" and "slower" are
19 VII, 3 |       or an alteration: for the terms "knowing" and "understanding"
20 VII, 4 |       commensurable if the same terms are applied to them without
21 VII, 4 |       commensurable if the same terms are applied to them without
22 VII, 4 |          In fact there are some terms of which even the definitions
23 VII, 4 |        in the case of equivocal terms sometimes the different
24 VII, 4 |      because we have no pair of terms that will convey this "difference"
25 VII, 4 |        relations, nor are there terms to express each of them
26 VIII, 8|        to those who ask, in the terms of Zeno’s argument, whether