Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2 |           time the holders of the theory of which we are speaking
 2   I, 4 |           so-called elements.~The theory of Anaxagoras that the principles
 3   I, 4 |        Again (3) according to the theory all such things are already
 4   I, 5 |          no reason indeed for the theory, but contrained as it were
 5  II, 2 |     separated. The holders of the theory of Forms do the same, though
 6  II, 8 |         even the champions of the theory which is before us would
 7 III, 6 |        difficulty in refuting the theory of indivisible lines.) The
 8  IV, 1 |       characteristics. Again, the theory that the void exists involves
 9  IV, 4 | foundations, we must complete the theory. We ought to try to make
10  IV, 8 |     impossible implication of the theory. It is also evident that
11   V, 2 |      possible, is excluded by the theory). Moreover this other can
12  VI, 10|      composed of starts: for this theory simply makes motion consist
13 VII, 4 |         conveyed. If we adopt the theory that it is number that constitutes
14 VIII, 1|        may have maintained such a theory as his that the universe
15 VIII, 1|       even here the holder of the theory ought not only to assert
16 VIII, 1|            always": so, while his theory is right in so far as it
17 VIII, 3|         in an attempt to show the theory to be reasonable, would
18 VIII, 3|   Although the supporters of this theory do not state clearly what
19 VIII, 3|           has to be included. The theory resembles that about the
20 VIII, 3|         sometimes in motion. This theory must be pronounced impossible
21 VIII, 3|          the obvious, for on this theory there can be no such thing
22 VIII, 3|          motion unnaturally. This theory, then, does away with becoming
23 VIII, 8|          point of view of general theory, the same result would also