Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 4 |         of explanation.~The first set make the underlying body
 2   I, 4 |           i.e. forms).~The second set assert that the contrarieties
 3  II, 3 |            Of these pairs the one set are causes in the sense
 4  II, 3 |         e.g. the parts, the other set in the sense of essence-the
 5 III, 1 |       question depends on another set of arguments, and the truth
 6  IV, 8 |        could say why a thing once set in motion should stop anywhere;
 7  IV, 8 |       those who believe in a void set it up. They think that if
 8  IV, 12|         in the sense that the one set belongs to number, the other
 9 VII, 1 |           be thought that what we set out to prove has thus been
10 VII, 3 |      possessed of it not by being set in motion at all itself
11 VIII, 2|       motion within itself can be set in motion; e.g. inanimate
12 VIII, 2|          rest, are at some moment set in motion: whereas, if motion
13 VIII, 2|           are then at some moment set in motion, that is to say
14 VIII, 2|           without anything having set us in motion from without.
15 VIII, 2|          things, which are always set in motion by something else
16 VIII, 2|    something not in motion may be set in motion, that which caused
17 VIII, 2| afterwards walks, not having been set in motion apparently by
18 VIII, 2|    environment, and some of these set in motion the intellect
19 VIII, 3|           a part of them will not set as much in motion in any
20 VIII, 3|           but no one of these was set in motion separately: they
21 VIII, 3|         separately: they were all set in motion together. It is
22 VIII, 3|           be at rest before being set in motion unnaturally. This
23 VIII, 6|          in respect of the motion set up by its own agency: here