Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2  | description which applies to the arguments both of Melissus and of
 2   I, 3  |          to be one. Further, the arguments they use to prove their
 3   I, 3  |        of fact, give way to both arguments. To the argument that all
 4  II, 8  |    ox-progeny" did.~Such are the arguments (and others of the kind)
 5 III, 1  |        depends on another set of arguments, and the truth will be made
 6 III, 5  |     sensible body. The following arguments give a general demonstration
 7 III, 5  |           It is plain from these arguments that there is no body which
 8 III, 8  |        remains to dispose of the arguments which are supposed to support
 9  IV, 6  |        views taken of it involve arguments both for and against, in
10  IV, 7  |         it is easy to refute the arguments by which they prove the
11  IV, 10 |        making use of the current arguments. First, does it belong to
12  VI, 2  |    Moreover, the current popular arguments make it plain that, if time
13  VI, 9  |          of indivisibles.~Zeno’s arguments about motion, which cause
14  VI, 9  |        These then are two of his arguments.~The third is that already
15 VIII, 2 |                            2~The arguments that may be advanced against
16 VIII, 3 |        them. Further, just as in arguments about mathematics objections
17 VIII, 3 |          These and other similar arguments, then, should convince us
18 VIII, 3 |          to confront it with the arguments previously advanced. We
19 VIII, 6 |          only from the foregoing arguments, but also by considering
20 VIII, 7 |         then, from the foregoing arguments that locomotion is the primary
21 VIII, 8 |         such-like, then, are the arguments for our conclusion that
22 VIII, 8 |       indicated by the following arguments. Everything whose motion
23 VIII, 10|         then, from the foregoing arguments that it is impossible for