Book, Paragraph
1 I, 4 | differentiae, i.e. forms).~The second set assert that the contrarieties
2 I, 6 | generate from each other, the second contrariety will be superfluous.
3 II, 1 | or bone is. Thus in the second sense of "nature" it would
4 II, 7 | incapable of motion, the second of things in motion, but
5 III, 2 | and the principles in the second column are indefinite because
6 III, 3 | present in each, and, a second absurdity, a thing will
7 IV, 8 | admits no difference.~The second reason is this: all movement
8 IV, 9 | they say fire is rare); second, the void turns out to be
9 V, 1 | which is in motion, the second is that to which the motion
10 V, 2 | another to ignorance.~In the second place, if there is to be
11 V, 2 | invisible to sound); in the second place to that which is moved
12 V, 3 | first day of the month to be second: in each case the latter
13 VI, 4 | that it occupies. In the second place it is divisible according
14 VI, 6 | the distance. But if this second thing whose velocity is
15 VI, 9 | have discussed above.~The second is the so-called "Achilles",
16 VI, 9 | period of time: and in the second place the whole also is
17 VII, 1 | part that is moved. In the second place that which is in motion
18 VIII, 2 | clearer.~As regards the second objection, no absurdity
19 VIII, 5 | unmixed.~We will now take the second alternative. If the movement
20 VIII, 5 | alternative is impossible, and the second is fantastic: it is absurd
21 VIII, 5 | is intermediate. In the second place, there is no necessity
22 VIII, 10| no more possible for this second thing than for the original
|