Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |         we do not think that we know a thing until we are acquainted
 2   I, 4 |   Therefore it is impossible to know things which are composed
 3   I, 4 |         them; for it is when we know the nature and quantity
 4   I, 4 |   components that we suppose we know a complex.~Further (2) if
 5   I, 7 |      that which becomes. For we know that when a thing comes
 6  II, 2 | physicist should be supposed to know the nature of sun or moon,
 7  II, 2 |         sun or moon, but not to know any of their essential attributes,
 8  II, 2 |        to different sciences to know each severally?~If we look
 9  II, 2 |       of the same discipline to know the form and the matter
10  II, 2 |         part of physics also to know nature in both its senses.~
11  II, 2 |         then must the physicist know the form or essence? Up
12  II, 2 |     perhaps, as the doctor must know sinew or the smith bronze (
13  II, 3 |       and men do not think they know a thing till they have grasped
14  II, 4 |       spontaneity, and although know that each of them can be
15  II, 5 |         and spontaneity; for we know that things of this kind
16  II, 7 |    business of the physicist to know about them all, and if he
17  II, 7 |      sake of something, we must know this cause also. We must
18  IV, 11|       discover-since we wish to know what time is-what exactly
19  IV, 12|        the movement, just as we know the number by what is numbered,
20  IV, 12|       horse as the unit. For we know how many horses there are
21  IV, 12|        the one horse as unit we know the number of the horses
22  IV, 12|      say the same of getting to know or of becoming young or