Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 4 | inseparable. If then colours and states had entered into the mixture,
 2  II, 1 |       else being its affections, states, or dispositions. Every
 3  IV, 9 |      potentially matter for both states; so that the same thing
 4   V, 4 |       one? and generally are the states and affections in bodies
 5   V, 4 |          difference: that if the states are two then it follows
 6   V, 6 |         motions and not opposite states of rest. States of rest
 7   V, 6 |         opposite states of rest. States of rest in contraries are
 8   V, 6 |      other that.~Now motions and states of rest universally exhibit
 9 VII, 3 |          shapes, and in acquired states and in the processes of
10 VII, 3 |      alteration.~Again, acquired states, whether of the body or
11 VII, 3 |          is evident that neither states nor the processes of losing
12 VII, 3 |          of losing and acquiring states are alterations, though
13 VII, 3 |        they may be, on which the states primarily depend. For each
14 VII, 3 |         similar in regard to the states of the soul, all of which (
15 VII, 3 |         any more than the bodily states be alterations, nor can
16 VII, 3 |         and acquisition of these states no less than the loss and
17 VII, 3 |      loss and acquisition of the states of the body must be the
18 VII, 3 |          alterations.~Again, the states of the intellectual part
19 VII, 3 |          is no becoming of these states. For that which is potentially
20 VII, 3 |        use and activity of these states, unless it is thought that
21 VIII, 7|     thing the contraries will be states of rest. And we have a similar