Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 4  |         from the thing, but is in continuity with it, the thing is said
 2  IV, 4  |        Further, if one body is in continuity with another, it is not
 3  IV, 4  |           is thus separate but in continuity. For just as in change of
 4  IV, 6  |           body so as to break its continuity, as Democritus and Leucippus
 5   V, 3  |          contained in each other: continuity is impossible if these extremities
 6   V, 3  |    definition makes it plain that continuity belongs to things that naturally
 7   V, 3  |           is not. And if there is continuity there is necessarily contact,
 8   V, 3  |         that alone does not imply continuity: for the extremities of
 9   V, 4  |         be one. There will not be continuity between any motion and any
10   V, 4  |        other sphere: there can be continuity only when the extremities
11   V, 4  |           definition there can be continuity only when the ends of the
12   V, 4  |      continuous, but there can be continuity only in virtue of the motions
13 VIII, 6 |          things. The eternity and continuity of the process cannot be
14 VIII, 8 |           of its arrival at G the continuity of its motion is unbroken
15 VIII, 8 |         the same.~Again, from the continuity of the time in which the
16 VIII, 8 |       takes place we cannot infer continuity in the motion, but only
17 VIII, 8 |         shall find singleness and continuity: for here we are met by
18 VIII, 8 |          that no motion admits of continuity except rotatory motion:
19 VIII, 8 | alteration nor increase admits of continuity. We need now say no more
20 VIII, 8 |        that admits of infinity or continuity except rotatory locomotion.~
21 VIII, 10|        pushing (in which case the continuity amounts to no more than