Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 3  |         is used in several. His conclusion does not follow, because
 2   I, 4  |      each other led them to the conclusion. The one, they reasoned,
 3  II, 3  |        and the premisses of the conclusion, in the sense of "that from
 4  II, 7  |       that is to be so" (as the conclusion presupposes the premisses); (
 5  II, 9  | otherwise just as there, if-the conclusion is not true, the premiss
 6  VI, 2  |        can be indivisible.~This conclusion follows not only from the
 7  VI, 5  |    separately, the truth of our conclusion will be equally evident,
 8  VI, 8  |     quicker or slower, the same conclusion follows.~And that which
 9  VI, 8  |      for that would involve the conclusion that that which is in locomotion
10  VI, 9  |  assumption is not granted, the conclusion will not follow.~The fourth
11  VI, 9  |         he thinks, involves the conclusion that half a given time is
12 VII, 1  |       time K, this involves the conclusion that an infinite motion
13 VII, 4  |         other.~But how will our conclusion work out in the case of
14 VII, 4  |     enables us to arrive at the conclusion that the one alteration
15 VIII, 2 |       be said to be a necessary conclusion, provided that it is possible
16 VIII, 3 |     difficulties raised and the conclusion of the investigation upon
17 VIII, 5 | existence of a possibility, any conclusion that we thereby reach will
18 VIII, 5 |        be motion.~Moreover, the conclusion to which we have been led
19 VIII, 8 |       are the arguments for our conclusion that derive cogency from
20 VIII, 10|         premisses on which this conclusion depends.~One of these premisses
21 VIII, 10|        before proceeding to our conclusion it will be well to discuss