Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 3 |    that which may or may not belong to the subject or that in
 2   I, 5 |     the small", for example, belong to the former class, "the
 3  II, 1 |      to the attributes which belong to them in virtue of what
 4  II, 2 |      each severally. Does it belong then to the same or to different
 5  II, 5 |    why chance is supposed to belong to the class of the indefinite
 6  II, 6 |  clear that events which (1) belong to the general class of
 7  II, 6 | differ from each other. Both belong to the mode of causation "
 8 III, 1 |    Now motion is supposed to belong to the class of things which
 9 III, 3 |      full sense, though they belong to the same subject, the
10 III, 5 |    But neither character can belong to it: it cannot be either
11  IV, 4 |    are supposed correctly to belong to it essentially. We assume
12  IV, 4 |   the attributes supposed to belong to it do really belong to
13  IV, 4 |    to belong to it do really belong to it, and further will
14  IV, 4 |   the subjects to which they belong do so.~We say that a thing
15  IV, 6 |  void, also, must be held to belong to the physicist-namely
16  IV, 10|    arguments. First, does it belong to the class of things that
17  IV, 11|    is number; for boundaries belong only to that which they
18   V, 2 |      Since, then, motion can belong neither to Being nor to
19  VI, 4 |    divisible" and "infinite" belong in the first instance to
20 VII, 4 |  things to which the motions belong essentially and not accidentally-differ
21 VIII, 9|    all these characteristics belong to the centre: that is to