Book, Paragraph
1 II, 2 | continuous change and there is a stage which is last, this stage
2 II, 2 | stage which is last, this stage is the end or "that for
3 II, 2 | was born". For not every stage that is last claims to be
4 III, 6 | definite if you like at each stage, yet always different.~But
5 V, 2 | here there will be no first stage and therefore no following
6 V, 2 | and therefore no following stage either. On this hypothesis,
7 V, 2 | when it has reached the stage of becoming: since it cannot
8 VI, 2 | been demonstrated at each stage as a new point of departure:
9 VI, 6 | and we can never take any stage and say that it is absolutely
10 VI, 6 | Consequently no absolutely first stage of change can be represented
11 VI, 8 | there being no primary stage either of being in motion
12 VI, 9 | must arrive at the half-way stage before it arrives at the
13 VIII, 2 | be elucidated at a later stage in our discussion.~
14 VIII, 5 | an instrument is at each stage caused by something different
15 VIII, 7 | both now and at a previous stage that it is possible that
16 VIII, 8 | it belongs to the later stage of what happens to it. Let
17 VIII, 8 | being so at any particular stage rather than at an earlier
18 VIII, 10| consecutive series is at each stage less than that possessed
|