Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |          and "knowable" without qualification. So in the present inquiry
 2   I, 3 |        is not cannot be without qualification, there is no reason why
 3   I, 7 |         be said "to be" without qualification, come to be from some substratum,
 4   I, 8 |     nothing can be said without qualification to come from what is not.
 5   I, 9 |    thing may come to be without qualification from not being, accepting
 6   I, 9 |    which it comes to be without qualification, and which persists in the
 7  II, 7 |       from this" either without qualification or in most cases); (2) that "
 8  II, 7 |        better thus (not without qualification, but with reference to the
 9 III, 1 |     they were identical without qualification, i.e. in definition, the
10   V, 1 |         a thing is said without qualification to change because something
11   V, 1 |     thing "comes to be" without qualification, not that it "comes to be"
12   V, 1 |       yet that which is without qualification "not-so-and-so" cannot in
13   V, 4 |        that make it one without qualification: to effect this, that in
14   V, 4 |       call a motion one without qualification.~Further, a motion is also
15   V, 6 |          however, needs further qualification: there remains the question,
16  VI, 2 |      the whole: in fact without qualification it passes over a less magnitude
17 VIII, 7| regarded simply as such without qualification or as affecting something
18 VIII, 9|       it "is in motion" without qualification.~Our present position, then,