Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 9 |      starting-point, but of the reasoning, not of the action; while
 2  II, 9 |       the starting-point of the reasoning only, as there is no action.
 3  VI, 1 |       one another: and the same reasoning applies in the case of all
 4  VI, 1 |        are in contact.~The same reasoning applies equally to magnitude,
 5  VI, 2 | direction being given. The same reasoning will also show the falsity
 6  VI, 4 |         is continuous.~The same reasoning will show the divisibility
 7  VI, 6 |        and again apply the same reasoning. So that which has changed
 8  VI, 7 |   becoming or of perishing. The reasoning he will prove that in a
 9  VI, 7 |        or in both: for the same reasoning will hold good.~This having
10  VI, 9 |                        9~Zeno’s reasoning, however, is fallacious,
11  VI, 9 |        time. The fallacy of the reasoning lies in the assumption that
12 VII, 5 |     there are men. Hence Zeno’s reasoning is false when he argues
13 VIII, 1|  affection of motion.)~The same reasoning will also serve to show
14 VIII, 1|      inductive or demonstrative reasoning. The Love and Strife postulated
15 VIII, 5|       must move itself. So this reasoning also shows that when a thing
16 VIII, 7|    primary. The same process of reasoning will also make clear at
17 VIII, 8|    other points, since the same reasoning holds good in every case.