Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 4 |        many, like Empedocles and Anaxagoras; for they too produce other
 2   I, 4 |          latter a single series. Anaxagoras again made both his "homceomerous"
 3   I, 4 |          elements.~The theory of Anaxagoras that the principles are
 4   I, 4 |        is correct enough, though Anaxagoras is not fully aware of what
 5   I, 4 |          are inseparable.~Nor is Anaxagoras right about the coming to
 6   I, 6 |          his principles all that Anaxagoras obtains from his innumerable
 7 III, 4 |  elements infinite in number, as Anaxagoras and Democritus do, say that
 8 III, 4 | according to the other.~Further, Anaxagoras held that any part is a
 9 III, 5 |      nature it is to be nowhere.~Anaxagoras gives an absurd account
10  IV, 6 |        speaking; this is true of Anaxagoras and of those who refute
11 VIII, 1|          the manner described by Anaxagoras, who says that all things
12 VIII, 1|         also those who like like Anaxagoras, assert a single principle (
13 VIII, 5|         itself unmoved. So, too, Anaxagoras is right when he says that
14 VIII, 9|          the former "combining". Anaxagoras, too, says that "Mind",