Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 3 |    defined in only one way. "Whiteness" will be different from "
 2   I, 3 |     different from "what has whiteness". Nor does this mean that
 3   I, 3 |    above what is white. For "whiteness" and "that which is white"
 4  IV, 4 |     with something else, as "whiteness" or "science". These have
 5  IV, 9 |       in which both heat and whiteness are not present. So too,
 6   V, 1 |    be said, are motions, and whiteness is an affection: thus there
 7   V, 1 |     may reply that it is not whiteness but whitening that is a
 8   V, 6 |     must be. And (1) rest in whiteness is of course not contrary
 9 VII, 4 | which primarily contains the whiteness is the same in both, viz.
10 VII, 4 | equality", "sweetness", and "whiteness" will severally always be
11 VII, 4 |  commensurable in respect of whiteness.~Similarly in the case of
12 VII, 4 |      particular instances of whiteness or sweetness are the same
13 VIII, 8|   how could contraries, e.g. whiteness and blackness, meet in the