Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 3 | plainly divisible into other substances, if we consider the mere
 2   I, 3 |     and "biped" must also be substances. For if not substances,
 3   I, 3 |    be substances. For if not substances, they must be attributes-and
 4   I, 3 |      composed of indivisible substances? Some thinkers did, in point
 5   I, 4 |      both his "homceomerous" substances and his contraries infinite
 6   I, 6 |    derived from what are not substances? Or how can non-substances
 7   I, 7 |  come to be so-and-so". Only substances are said to "come to be"
 8   I, 7 |  else of substance.~But that substances too, and anything else that
 9 III, 5 |   qua infinite an element in substances, any more than the invisible
10 III, 5 |    that way? If they are not substances, a fortiori the infinite
11 VIII, 7|     in accordance with which substances are said to become and perish:
12 VIII, 9|     opinion that the primary substances are not subject to any of
13 VIII, 9|  that are compounds of these substances are so subject: the processes