Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 4 |       supposed to belong to it do really belong to it, and further
 2  IV, 6 |          not disprove what people really mean by it, but only their
 3  IV, 6 |         in clepsydras. But people really mean that there is an empty
 4  IV, 8 |        vacuum will be found to be really vacuous. For as, if one
 5   V, 4 |            yet this motion is not really one, but only specifically
 6   V, 4 |          different, and so cannot really be one, for motion that
 7  VI, 5 |           the change is something really existent: for a change may
 8  VI, 5 |        existent: for a change may really be completed, and there
 9 VII, 4 |     attribute in the two cases is really one and the same?~Can it
10 VII, 4 |          be equivocal though they really are.~When, then, is there
11 VIII, 2| difficulty raised by our objector really amounts to this-why is it
12 VIII, 3|           out that, even if it is really the case, as certain persons
13 VIII, 8|        and it is at G that it has really come to be when its course