Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2| motionless, as Parmenides and Melissus assert, or (ii) in motion,
 2   I, 2|      to the arguments both of Melissus and of Parmenides: their
 3   I, 2|     Or rather the argument of Melissus is gross and palpable and
 4   I, 2|     substance as subject. Now Melissus says that Being is infinite.
 5   I, 2|      will not be infinite, as Melissus says-nor, indeed, limited,
 6   I, 3|     contentiously-I mean both Melissus and Parmenides. [Their premisses
 7   I, 3|     Or rather the argument of Melissus is gross and palpable and
 8   I, 3|   proceeding.] The fallacy of Melissus is obvious. For he supposes
 9 III, 6|       have spoken better than Melissus. The latter says that the
10  IV, 6|      can many unequal bodies.~Melissus, indeed, infers from these
11  IV, 7|  which, incidentally, escaped Melissus; viz. that the full can