Book, Paragraph

 1  VI, 3|     distance less than AB, say AG. But since the slower will
 2  VI, 3|    whole present in traversing AG, the quicker will occupy
 3  VI, 4|      motion: e.g. if the whole AG is in motion, there will
 4  VI, 4|       DZ must be the motion of AG: for DZ must constitute
 5  VI, 4|       constitute the motion of AG inasmuch as DE and EZ severally
 6  VI, 5|       belonging to it. For let AG be divisible, and let it
 7  VI, 5| effected in AB or again in BG, AG cannot be the primary thing
 8  VI, 5|     been changing in the whole AG: but our assumption was
 9  VI, 5|        our assumption was that AG contains only the completion
10  VI, 5|       suppose that one part of AG contains the process and
11 VII, 1|        it is, it is clear that AG would be in motion while