Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2|     infinite except through a concomitant attribute, that is, if at
 2   I, 5|     it does so in virtue of a concomitant attribute. For how could "
 3   I, 5|     it may be, in virtue of a concomitant attribute), but into "not-white"-
 4   I, 7|       each is in respect of a concomitant attribute-plainly, I say,
 5   I, 7|   come from it in virtue of a concomitant attribute; the privation,
 6  II, 1| itself and not in virtue of a concomitant attribute.~I say "not in
 7  II, 1|       say "not in virtue of a concomitant attribute", because (for
 8  II, 1|     themselves in virtue of a concomitant attribute-it lies in the
 9  II, 3|     not merely in virtue of a concomitant attribute), e.g. both the
10   V, 6|      be identical or at least concomitant with the locomotion of a