Book, Paragraph

1   I, 2|              either (i) motionless, as Parmenides and Melissus assert, or (
2   I, 2|                both of Melissus and of Parmenides: their premisses are false
3   I, 2|          says-nor, indeed, limited, as Parmenides says, for though the limit
4   I, 3| contentiously-I mean both Melissus and Parmenides. [Their premisses are false
5   I, 3|            argument holds good against Parmenides also, besides any that may
6   I, 3|             apart from each other. But Parmenides had not come in sight of
7   I, 5|              one and unmoved (for even Parmenides treats hot and cold as principles
8   I, 9|            this point the statement of Parmenides. Secondly, they think that
9 III, 6|              the end is a limit.~Hence Parmenides must be thought to have