Book, Paragraph

1   I, 3|     substance, "animal" and "biped" must also be substances.
2   I, 3|    of "man" for instance in "biped", or that of "white man"
3   I, 3|     then this is so, and if "biped" is supposed to be an attribute
4   I, 3|       might possibly not be "biped", or the definition of "
5   I, 3|      into the definition of "biped"-which is impossible, as
6   I, 3| other hand, we suppose that "biped" and "animal" are attributes
7   I, 3|   the subject of which both "biped" and "animal" and each separately
8   I, 3| subject also of the complex "biped animal".~Are we then to