Book, Paragraph

  1      I, IV  |                                  IV~Property is a part of the household,
  2      I, IV  |            and the art of acquiring property is a part of the art of
  3      I, IV  |            a living possession, and property a number of such instruments;
  4      I, VIII|             Let us now inquire into property generally, and into the
  5      I, VIII|          been shown to be a part of property. The first question is whether
  6      I, VIII|          consider whence wealth and property can be procured, but there
  7      I, VIII|             there are many sorts of property and riches, then are husbandry,
  8      I, VIII|           needs of men may require. Property, in the sense of a bare
  9      I, VIII|           riches; for the amount of property which is needed for a good
 10      I, IX  |          the notion that riches and property have no limit. Being nearly
 11      I, IX  |           each is a use of the same property, but with a difference:
 12      I, IX  |          these appears to depend on property, they are absorbed in getting
 13      I, XIII|           than to the excellence of property which we call wealth, and
 14     II, I   |         have wives and children and property in common, as Socrates proposes
 15     II, III |             his wife, and so of his property and of all that falls to
 16     II, III |         each." In like manner their property would be described as belonging
 17     II, V   |           be our arrangements about property: should the citizens of
 18     II, V   |            this is a form of common property which is said to exist among
 19     II, V   |   especially in their having common property. The partnerships of fellow-travelers
 20     II, V   |             attend the community of property; the present arrangement,
 21     II, V   |         advantages of both systems. Property should be in a certain sense
 22     II, V   |      although every man has his own property, some things he will place
 23     II, V   |           It is clearly better that property should be private, but the
 24     II, V   |     rendered when a man has private property. These advantages are lost
 25     II, V   |         liberality in the matter of property. No one, when men have all
 26     II, V   |            the use which is made of property.~Such legislation may have
 27     II, V   |           the possession of private property. These evils, however, are
 28     II, V   |            numbers who have private property.~Again, we ought to reckon,
 29     II, V   |             the legislator has made property common. Let us remember
 30     II, V   |      husbandmen, too, to have their property in common? Or is each individual
 31     II, V   |             respect of marriage and property, what will be the form of
 32     II, V   |            husbandmen owners of the property upon condition of their
 33     II, V   |      whether community of wives and property be necessary for the lower
 34     II, V   |         common, and retains private property, the men will see to the
 35     II, V   |  agricultural class have both their property and their wives in common?
 36     II, VI  |          children, the community of property, and the constitution of
 37     II, VI  |          the community of women and property, he supposes everything
 38     II, VI  |            Should not the amount of property be defined in some way which
 39     II, VI  |             man should have so much property as will enable him to live
 40     II, VI  |             a man must have so much property as will enable him to live
 41     II, VI  |          have to do with the use of property. A man cannot use property
 42     II, VI  |          property. A man cannot use property with mildness or courage,
 43     II, VI  |         virtues is inseparable from property. There is an inconsistency,
 44     II, VI  |           in too, in equalizing the property and not regulating the number
 45     II, VI  |             number of citizens, the property is always distributed among
 46     II, VI  |             is in want; but, if the property were incapable of division
 47     II, VI  |            to limit population than property; and that the limit should
 48     II, VI  |           allows that a man’s whole property may be increased fivefold,
 49     II, VII |             some, the regulation of property is the chief point of all,
 50     II, VII |             who fixes the amount of property should also fix the number
 51     II, VII |       children are too many for the property, the law must be broken.
 52     II, VII |            That the equalization of property exercises an influence on
 53     II, VII |            which forbid the sale of property: among the Locrians, for
 54     II, VII |            a man is not to sell his property unless he can prove unmistakably
 55     II, VII |          where there is equality of property, the amount may be either
 56     II, VII |           in states, not only equal property, but equal education. Still
 57     II, VII |            out of the inequality of property, but out of the inequality
 58     II, VII |             about the inequality of property, the higher class about
 59     II, VII |         cure in the equalization of property, which will take away from
 60     II, VII |              And so with respect to property: there should not only be
 61     II, VII |            coming from without. The property of the state should not
 62     II, VII |          siege.~The equalization of property is one of the things that
 63     II, VII |             not so much to equalize property as to train the nobler sort
 64     II, VIII|         warriors, the third was the property of the husbandmen. He also
 65     II, IX  |      criticism on the inequality of property. While some of the Spartan
 66     II, IX  |            of their laws respecting property; for the city sank under
 67     II, IX  |      numbers by the equalization of property. Again, the law which relates
 68     II, XII |      Phaleas is the equalization of property; of Plato, the community
 69     II, XII |             of women, children, and property, the common meals of women,
 70    III, IV  |         family of husband and wife, property of master and slave, so
 71    III, VIII|            oligarchy is when men of property have the government in their
 72    III, VIII|        indigent, and not the men of property, are the rulers. And here
 73    III, VIII|         what if the many are men of property and have the power in their
 74    III, IX  |            be proportioned to their property, and the oligarchical doctrine
 75    III, X   |         divide among themselves the property of the rich—is not this
 76    III, X   |            majority divide anew the property of the minority, is it not
 77    III, XI  |              and having but a small property qualification, sit in the
 78    III, XI  |             many persons, and their property collectively is greater
 79    III, XI  |    collectively is greater than the property of one or of a few individuals
 80     IV, III |           differences of wealth and property—for example, in the number
 81     IV, IV  |             were possessed of large property before the Lydian War. But
 82     IV, IV  |             to the state with their property; these form the seventh
 83     IV, IV  |      elected according to a certain property qualification, but a low
 84     IV, IV  |          has the required amount of property has a share in the government,
 85     IV, IV  |    government, but he who loses his property loses his rights. Another
 86     IV, V   |      different kinds: one where the property qualification for office
 87     IV, VI  |           all who have acquired the property qualification are admitted
 88     IV, VI  |       hindered by the care of their property, which often fetters the
 89     IV, VI  |           of the citizens have some property, but not very much; and
 90     IV, VI  |       government, and in respect of property have neither so much as
 91     IV, VI  |       themselves. But if the men of property in the state are fewer than
 92     IV, VI  |           former case, and own more property, there arises a second form
 93     IV, VI  |       numbers and increase of their property, there arises a third and
 94     IV, IX  |         thus democracies require no property qualification, or only a
 95     IV, IX  | democratical again when there is no property qualification, oligarchical
 96     IV, XI  |             moderate and sufficient property; for where some possess
 97     IV, XIII|          those who are qualified by property cannot decline office upon
 98     IV, XIII|           who carry arms. As to the property qualification, no absolute
 99     IV, XIII|       outraged or deprived of their property, will be quiet enough.~But
100     IV, XV  |           distinguished either by a property qualification, or by birth,
101      V, I   |          being unequal, that is, in property, they suppose themselves
102      V, IV  |           account of their father’s property and the treasure which he
103      V, V   |            able to confiscate their property. At length the exiles, becoming
104      V, V   |            make a division of their property, or diminish their incomes
105      V, V   |           of the magistrates and no property qualification, the aspirants
106      V, VI  |       oligarchs waste their private property by extravagant living; for
107      V, VI  |        other good fortune, the same property becomes many times as valuable,
108      V, VII |           thus at Lacedaemon, where property tends to pass into few hands,
109      V, VIII|            the general valuation of property with that of past years,
110      V, VIII|       spared; not only should their property not be divided, but their
111      V, IX  |      included in it. If equality of property is introduced, the state
112      V, X   |          another is confiscation of property.~The ends sought by conspiracies
113      V, XI  |            the treasury their whole property. The tyrant is also fond
114      V, XI  |             are offended when their property is touched, so are the lovers
115      V, XII |            all do not possess equal property, or all are not equally
116      V, XII |           of the leaders lose their property they are ripe for revolution;
117     VI, II  |             be made by lot; that no property qualification should be
118     VI, III |             a thousand poor men the property qualifications of five hundred
119     VI, III |          according to the amount of property. In both principles there
120     VI, III |             unjustly confiscate the property of the wealthy minority.
121     VI, IV  |          work, and do not covet the property of others. Indeed, they
122     VI, IV  |           are not deprived of their property; for some of them grow quickly
123     VI, V   |            of our own day often get property confiscated in the law-courts
124     VI, V   |             and make a law that the property of the condemned should
125     VI, V   |         money must be obtained by a property tax and confiscations and
126     VI, V   |        sharing the use of their own property with the poor, they gain
127     VI, VII |         before, to those who have a property qualification, or, as in
128    VII, I   |            their desires of wealth, property, power, reputation, and
129    VII, V   |            what is the right use of property and wealth: a matter which
130    VII, VIII|        house. And so states require property, but property, even though
131    VII, VIII|        states require property, but property, even though living beings
132    VII, IX  |             should be the owners of property, for they are citizens,
133    VII, IX  |            to them all. And clearly property should be in their hands,
134    VII, X   |             for I do not think that property ought to be common, as some
135    VII, X   |           private estates of men of property, the remainder should be
136    VII, X   |             remainder should be the property of the state and employed