Book, Paragraph

 1     II, II  |      the premise from which the argument of Socrates proceeds, "that
 2     II, III | ambiguous, and even in abstract argument becomes a source of logical
 3    III, VIII|    their respective states?~The argument seems to show that, whether
 4    III, IX  |         both the parties to the argument are speaking of a limited
 5    III, XI  |         of application; for the argument would equally hold about
 6    III, XI  |         that, according to this argument, neither the election of
 7    III, XIII|    acknowledged superiority the argument in favor of ostracism is
 8     IV, IV  | husbandmen—is immaterial to the argument. The higher as well as the
 9    VII, I   |       and by a similar train of argument, the happy state may be
10    VII, III |         the statesman best. The argument of the latter is that he
11    VII, XIV |         which may be refuted by argument and has long ago been refuted
12   VIII, IV  |      only, and even in this the argument proves them to be inferior