Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  1 |     affirmed or truly denied of any subject, and that "triangle" means
  2      I,  1 |      predicable of anything else as subject) are only learnt in this
  3      I,  1 |           middle of a minor term as subject to a major. Before he was
  4      I,  1 |             i.e. what they made the subject of their premiss, viz. not
  5      I,  2 |        single attribute of a single subject. If a proposition is dialectical,
  6      I,  2 |         conjoins a predicate with a subject is an affirmation; the part
  7      I,  2 |           or the non-existence of a subject, it is a hypothesis; if
  8      I,  2 |          attribute’s inherence in a subject always itself inheres in
  9      I,  2 |        always itself inheres in the subject more firmly than that attribute;
 10      I,  4 |            in every instance of its subject", an "essential" attribute,
 11      I,  4 |             such as belong to their subject as elements in its essential
 12      I,  4 |        which is not predicated of a subject other than itself: e.g. "
 13      I,  4 |           then, not predicated of a subject I call essential; things
 14      I,  4 |              things predicated of a subject I call accidental or "coincidental".~
 15      I,  4 |        opposites must inhere in the subject; e.g. in line must be either
 16      I,  4 |           affirmed or denied of any subject, essential attributes must
 17      I,  4 |            to every instance of its subject, and to every instance essentially
 18      I,  4 |       attribute that belongs to its subject as such, are identical.
 19      I,  4 | commensurately and universally to a subject when it can be shown to
 20      I,  4 |             random instance of that subject and when the subject is
 21      I,  4 |           that subject and when the subject is the first thing to which
 22      I,  4 |         triangle is not the primary subject of this attribute but triangle
 23      I,  4 |         primarily-that is the first subject to which the predicate in
 24      I,  4 |             belonging to this first subject commensurately and universally:
 25      I,  5 |           this mistake (1) when the subject is an individual or individuals
 26      I,  5 |           has no name: (3) when the subject which the demonstrator takes
 27      I,  5 |            will not be true of this subject primarily and commensurately
 28      I,  5 |          demonstration is true of a subject primarily and commensurately
 29      I,  5 |          that it is true of a given subject primarily and as such. Case (
 30      I,  5 |       perpendicular were the proper subject of the demonstration because
 31      I,  5 |             attribute belong to the subject of which it has been demonstrated
 32      I,  5 |           is the point at which the subject. to which it belongs is
 33      I,  5 |           is primary? (i.e. to what subject can it be demonstrated as
 34      I,  5 |     predicable, and triangle is the subject to which it can be demonstrated
 35      I,  6 |          the genus constituting the subject matter of the demonstration;
 36      I,  8 |       connexion with its perishable subject is not commensurately universal
 37      I,  8 |            of some instances of the subject and not of others); so that
 38      I,  9 |     character, therefore, which the subject may share with another-and
 39      I,  9 |             not as belonging to its subject as such: otherwise they
 40      I,  9 |        attribute’s connexion with a subject is accidental unless we
 41      I,  9 |         angles as belonging to that subject in which it inheres essentially,
 42      I,  9 |           and "appropriate" to that subject: so that if that middle
 43      I,  9 |           separate science (for the subject genus is separate), but
 44      I,  10|           that which it posits, the subject genus whose essential attributes
 45      I,  10|        demonstration are three: the subject, the attributes, and the
 46      I,  11|          same predicate of the same subject is not expressly posited
 47      I,  11|            or truly denied of every subject is posited by such demonstration
 48      I,  12|           inquiries on each several subject, but only such as fall within
 49      I,  15|         atomically connected with a subject B, so its disconnexion may
 50      I,  16|         with or disconnexion from a subject. Here, it is true, positive
 51      I,  18|    induction-i.e. only because each subject genus possesses, in virtue
 52      I,  19|           which are predicated of a subject essentially or naturally
 53      I,  19|            to anything else as to a subject, but the proximate subject
 54      I,  19|          subject, but the proximate subject of the attribute B—i.e.
 55      I,  19|            anything else but is the subject of attributes, and ascend
 56      I,  19|          predicate but not itself a subject of predicates, and descend
 57      I,  19|        demonstrable? Or do ultimate subject and primary attribute limit
 58      I,  19|     reciprocating terms, since when subject and predicate are convertible
 59      I,  19|        neither primary nor ultimate subject, seeing that all the reciprocals
 60      I,  19|             whether we say that the subject has an infinity of attributes
 61      I,  21|            itself attributable to a subject but itself the subject of
 62      I,  21|            a subject but itself the subject of attributes), or by descending
 63      I,  21|         mean a term predicable of a subject but not itself a subject).
 64      I,  21|            subject but not itself a subject). If this assumption is
 65      I,  21|       terminate and there will be a subject of which A is primarily
 66      I,  21|         required that B should be a subject of which a predicate is
 67      I,  22|       respectively of predicate and subject.~We shall assume, then,
 68      I,  22|             not accidentally of the subject, for on such predication
 69      I,  22|           is predicated of a single subject, the predicate must affirm
 70      I,  22|        predicate must affirm of the subject either some element constituting
 71      I,  22|          substance signify that the subject is identical with the predicate
 72      I,  22|           which are predicated of a subject not identical with themselves
 73      I,  22|            predicates of some other subject, and nothing can be white
 74      I,  22|          A-the predicate now become subject. But it has been shown that
 75      I,  22|      Callias, Callias of a further. subject as an element of its essential
 76      I,  22|            predication displays the subject as somehow qualified or
 77      I,  22|        predication must exhibit its subject as somehow qualified, quantified,
 78      I,  22|        predication implies a single subject and a single attribute,
 79      I,  22|             a different substratum. Subject to these assumptions then,
 80      I,  22|           is predicated of a single subject is infinite. For the subjects
 81      I,  22|      conclude that there is a given subject (D) of which some attribute (
 82      I,  22|          any term prior to the last subject of which it was predicated (
 83      I,  22|          number will be an ultimate subject of the whole infinite chain
 84      I,  22|    attributes such as contain their subject in their definition cannot
 85      I,  22|            be commensurate with the subject and not of wider extent.
 86      I,  23|         involved must be within one subject genus and be derived from
 87      I,  23|       predicate-suppose it C-of the subject B, and then suppose A similarly
 88      I,  23|          constantly condensed until subject and predicate become indivisible,
 89      I,  23|         fall beyond E, and E is the subject of which D is to be denied
 90      I,  23|            beyond the limits of the subject and the attribute denied
 91      I,  24|         instead of proving that the subject itself actually is x, proves
 92      I,  24|       demonstration proves that the subject itself is x. The demonstration,
 93      I,  24|         demonstration, then, that a subject, as such, possesses an attribute
 94      I,  24|       angles is attributable to its subject not qua isosceles but qua
 95      I,  24|            that attribute knows the subject as qua itself possessing
 96      I,  24|           up the whole matter: if a subject is proved to possess qua
 97      I,  24|      knowledge is his who knows the subject as possessing its attribute
 98      I,  29|            attributable to some one subject.~A further point worth investigating
 99      I,  33|       nature is opinion: man is the subject in both judgements, but
100     II,  2 |            qualification I mean the subject, e.g. moon or earth or sun
101     II,  2 |           triangle; by that which a subject is (in the partial sense)
102     II,  3 |             proves a predicate of a subject as attaching or as not attaching
103     II,  3 |          does not attach to a given subject; but different things require
104     II,  4 |            proves an attribute of a subject through the middle term;
105     II,  4 |             is both "peculiar" to a subject and predicated of it as
106     II,  4 |            But in that case (1) the subject, its definition, and the
107     II,  5 |             characterization of the subject follow necessarily from
108     II,  6 |           merely belong to a single subject as do musical and grammatical
109     II,  10|            accidentally in a single subject.~That then is one way of
110     II,  13|          attributes of each several subject, but in their application
111     II,  13|            are not confined to that subject). while an attribute may
112     II,  13|          every triad, yet also in a subject not a triad-as being inheres
113     II,  13|            of wider extent than the subject but collectively coextensive
114     II,  13|           collectively, to no other subject. Now since we have shown
115     II,  13|           in triad, or in any other subject whose attributes we select
116     II,  13|       synthesis is applicable to no subject other than the individual
117     II,  13|          that the substance of each subject is the predication of elements
118     II,  13|     identical with the being of the subject.~The author of a hand-book
119     II,  13|          author of a hand-book on a subject that is a generic whole
120     II,  13|             the genus, and that the subject one seeks to define is present
121     II,  13|          into A and B, and that the subject accepts one of the two as
122     II,  16|            one thing as its primary subject, let B be a primary subject
123     II,  16|         subject, let B be a primary subject in which A inheres, and
124     II,  16|      inheres, and C another primary subject of A, and D and E primary
125     II,  16|             belong exclusively to a subject which is a whole, and, if
126     II,  16|   coagulation is present-not in any subject but in a tree-then that
127     II,  17|         consider the effect and its subject as an accidental conjunction,
128     II,  17|             that cause, effect, and subject are reciprocally predicable
129     II,  17|            effect is wider than the subject (e.g. the possession of
130     II,  17|             reach a middle next the subject, and a premiss asserting
131     II,  17|           asserting it of the whole subject, and after that a middle-the
132     II,  18|            that is the cause of the subject’s falling under the universal.